Re: What's cooking in git.git

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:55:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> * jk/negative-hiderefs (2015-07-28) 2 commits
>  - refs: support negative transfer.hideRefs
>  - docs/config.txt: reorder hideRefs config
> 
>  Allow negative !ref entry in multi-value transfer.hideRefs
>  configuration to say "don't hide this one".
> 
>  An update to test coming?

Thanks for reminding me. I think we just want to squash this in to the
tip commit:

diff --git a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
index afde495..7756100 100755
--- a/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
+++ b/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh
@@ -150,7 +150,8 @@ do
 		git config --add $configsection.hiderefs "!refs/tags/magic" &&
 		git config --add $configsection.hiderefs refs/tags/magic/one &&
 		git ls-remote . >actual &&
-		verbose grep refs/tags/magic/two actual
+		verbose grep refs/tags/magic/two actual &&
+		! grep refs/tags/magic/one actual
 	'
 
 done

-Peff

PS I don't recall the outcome of our last discussion on the "verbose"
   test function. Here it makes debug output for the "grep" above more
   readable when it fails. But it also looks weird not to have the
   matching negative one for the final grep (which could be
   test_must_fail in this case, but we do not usually apply that to
   non-git commands). If you would prefer to strip out the "verbose"
   (from here and the test just below) while squashing, I am OK with
   that.