From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Brandon Williams" <bmwill@google.com>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j6t@kdbg.org>, "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] add SWAP macro
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:36:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170131223604.oa4h5ykhefvlergd@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy3xqq2w0.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 02:29:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
> > ... I wonder if it would be more natural for it to take
> > pointers-to-objects, making it look more like a real function (i.e.,
> > SWAP(&a, &b) instead of SWAP(a, b)". And then these funny corner cases
> > become quite obvious in the caller, because the caller is the one who
> > has to type "&".
>
> Hmmmm.
>
> While this looks very attractive in theory by forcing 'a' and 'b' to
> be lvalues, it probably invites mistakes go unnoticed during the
> review when the code wants to swap two pointer variables.
>
> For example,
>
> apply.c: SWAP(p->new_name, p->old_name);
>
> is now a bug and will swap only the first byte of these names, and
> the correct way to spell it would become:
>
> apply.c: SWAP(&p->new_name, &p->old_name);
>
> The latter clearly looks like swapping the new and old names, which
> is good, but I do not have any confidence that I will immediately
> spot a bug when presented the former under the new world order.
Yes, it's a problem with any function (or function-like interface) that
takes an untyped pointer. You don't know if the caller meant the pointer
or the pointer-to-pointer. In that sense it's no different than:
memcpy(p->new_name, p->old_name, len);
Is that right, or did we mean to copy the pointers themselves?
It does also help the reverse case:
int a, b;
SWAP(a, b);
which would give an error (you forgot the "&"). I don't know which is
more likely to be productive. But at least requiring pointer values
makes it consistent with other functions like memcpy, etc.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-28 21:13 [PATCH 0/5] introduce SWAP macro René Scharfe
2017-01-28 21:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] add " René Scharfe
2017-01-30 15:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 16:48 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 20:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 21:46 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-31 12:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-31 21:02 ` René Scharfe
2017-02-01 0:44 ` Ramsay Jones
2017-02-01 11:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 16:01 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 16:59 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 18:41 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-30 21:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 22:09 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 22:21 ` Brandon Williams
2017-01-31 21:03 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-31 21:35 ` Jeff King
2017-01-31 22:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-31 22:36 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-02-01 11:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-02-01 11:47 ` Jeff King
2017-02-01 18:06 ` René Scharfe
2017-02-01 18:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-07 22:04 ` René Scharfe
2017-02-07 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-08 15:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-31 12:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-04-24 11:29 ` Jeff King
2017-04-24 11:49 ` Jeff King
2017-04-24 13:13 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-28 17:04 ` René Scharfe
2017-04-28 21:49 ` Jeff King
2017-04-29 18:16 ` René Scharfe
2017-04-30 3:11 ` Jeff King
2017-05-02 5:29 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] apply: use " René Scharfe
2017-01-28 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] " René Scharfe
2017-01-30 16:03 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 17:18 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-31 21:02 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-28 21:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] diff: " René Scharfe
2017-01-30 16:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 17:26 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-28 21:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] graph: " René Scharfe
2017-01-30 16:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-30 17:41 ` René Scharfe
2017-01-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] introduce " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170131223604.oa4h5ykhefvlergd@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bmwill@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).