git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
	peff@peff.net, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: [PATCH] t/perf: export variable used in other blocks
Date: Thu,  2 Mar 2017 11:50:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170302195041.1699-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228221236.selqkf5wme3fvued@sigill.intra.peff.net>

In p0001, a variable was created in a test_expect_success block to be
used in later test_perf blocks, but was not exported. This caused the
variable to not appear in those blocks (this can be verified by writing
'test -n "$commit"' in those blocks), resulting in a slightly different
invocation than what was intended. Export that variable.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
---

Performance indeed does drop significantly with this patch. And I cannot
say "at least this is more correct", because it isn't - as Peff thinks,
it is indeed still not 100% accurate because of the resurfacing-object
issue he mentions (I've verified this by constructing a test that fails
even after this patch set).

Also, since we don't want to unify tree_ and blob_ (for the reason Peff
mentioned in another e-mail), feel free to drop this patch set.

Having said that, while looking at the perf test, I noticed an issue
with a non-exported variable, which is corrected in this patch.

 t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh b/t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh
index 16359d51a..ebf172401 100755
--- a/t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh
+++ b/t/perf/p0001-rev-list.sh
@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ test_perf 'rev-list --all --objects' '
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'create new unreferenced commit' '
-	commit=$(git commit-tree HEAD^{tree} -p HEAD)
+	commit=$(git commit-tree HEAD^{tree} -p HEAD) &&
+	test_export commit
 '
 
 test_perf 'rev-list $commit --not --all' '
-- 
2.12.0.rc1.440.g5b76565f74-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-03  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-25  1:18 [PATCH 0/3] Test fetch-pack's ability to fetch arbitrary blobs Jonathan Tan
2017-02-25  1:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] revision: unify {tree,blob}_objects in rev_info Jonathan Tan
2017-02-28 21:42   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-28 21:59     ` Jeff King
2017-03-02 18:36       ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-28 22:06   ` Jeff King
2017-02-25  1:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] revision: exclude trees/blobs given commit Jonathan Tan
2017-02-28 21:44   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-02-28 22:12   ` Jeff King
2017-03-02 19:50     ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2017-03-03  6:45       ` [PATCH] t/perf: export variable used in other blocks Jeff King
2017-03-03  7:14         ` [PATCH] t/perf: use $MODERN_GIT for all repo-copying steps Jeff King
2017-03-03  7:36           ` [PATCH] t/perf: add fallback for pre-bin-wrappers versions of git Jeff King
2017-03-03 18:51         ` [PATCH] t/perf: export variable used in other blocks Junio C Hamano
2017-03-03 22:31           ` Jeff King
2017-02-28 23:12   ` [PATCH 2/3] revision: exclude trees/blobs given commit Junio C Hamano
2017-02-25  1:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] upload-pack: compute blob reachability correctly Jonathan Tan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170302195041.1699-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).