From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: "Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: fetch in certain repo always gives "did not send all necessary objects"
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 13:17:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207181706.GA4227@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BH0rSELVJV11MJM=KFU2jAEuhVTzUUBskghgku+y_ozDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:25:42AM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > So other_head_refs knows that it's looking at the worktrees. And it
> > passes the alternate ref-store to refs_head_ref(), with "add_one_ref" as
> > the callback. But the knowledge that we're not talking about the real
> > "HEAD" is lost as we cross that callback boundary. We'd need to either
> > add another parameter to the callback, or have some way of talking about
> > "HEAD in this worktree" as a refname (which AFAIK we don't have).
>
> Can we use "worktrees/${WORKTREE}/HEAD"? It already satisfies all the
> necessary rev-parse rules...
True, but it's mostly an accident that it works. And once we have ref
backends besides the filesystem, it will probably stop working.
I think there was discussion at some point of embedding worktree refs
into the normal ref namespace, but I don't know what came of it (it's
not a feature I've followed very closely).
> (And on a slight tangent...do we want to start disallowing the
> creation of branches/tags whose name starts with "worktrees/",
> "refs/", "hooks/", or other paths that exists under gitdir? Making a
> branch named "refs/heads/foo" so that it fully-qualifies as
> "refs/heads/refs/heads/foo" is always fun)
We recently taught the porcelain to disallow a branch named "HEAD".
Though I think there are actually two related problems with different
solutions. One is saying something like:
git checkout -b HEAD
or:
git checkout -b refs/heads/foo
both of which will not do what you want, and leave you with a
funnily-named branch in the ref namespace.
But that's separate from the fact that:
git rev-parse info/refs
will look at a file that is not a ref at all. Long-term I think the
solution is storage formats that don't mingle with other files. But we
could probably teach even the files-backend that any ref at the
top-level is supposed to be either in refs/, or to consist only of
"[A-Z_]".
-Peff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-07 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 23:04 BUG: fetch in certain repo always gives "did not send all necessary objects" Elijah Newren
2018-02-06 23:20 ` Stefan Beller
2018-02-07 0:00 ` Elijah Newren
2018-02-07 11:08 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-02-07 13:23 ` Jeff King
2018-02-07 18:12 ` Elijah Newren
2018-02-07 13:21 ` Jeff King
2018-02-07 13:25 ` Jeff King
2018-02-07 17:25 ` Elijah Newren
2018-02-07 18:17 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180207181706.GA4227@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).