From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94BC1F597 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732823AbeHABVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:21:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com ([209.85.215.195]:34324 "EHLO mail-pg1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732817AbeHABVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:21:50 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id y5-v6so9843079pgv.1 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=sSlSveeX2xb1GeFqFVVlIudBZMSNpwzW1XH9i6g3Rb8=; b=Fh/mtjZ69tnrP+Uvf+MGzqX9aZ4cXTLyr+pBEVjuEIe6cY+jRQEPwg4AJz5QfKNWlY r9Q5naK6vgdGO8b9t7LlESqW9F4f6TG0JdxpK9QNTlp6JFJTXa+QaA1hrhaZER/KzFuW ObwDqXhYLNBB2ATIVLnzNJYrmVa6hI+iC5FO6UaxyP+7hNrXlP7SHz/RuGSmCjILqg+u nrIEKnuskLj+8dUZ4RrjDsgknwOtMZIbyjYHxjfaHPh9md7kgJQGZV28BF2sInBMdcwd n+FS2A2ZkyyMiLy7rJklr5uftUabAnrLW6LrCpa7j88FI9BYTVnoosTP65ZMuNX3whXF tH/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=sSlSveeX2xb1GeFqFVVlIudBZMSNpwzW1XH9i6g3Rb8=; b=AGTgr8wwlPTG5y6V6JirjjVcJTYv/xX5fCrJcwKZf0sVfg7TxfmMRo0ALXwnF27J+q dvqWQW41z0YrBl+WysQaQ0OLkZqUnsKkt9VWIU9tRWEyJeCJCDNBx79bjgYDS8Tm/vim aQ52vDiNwU3KWrcrjitUAG600EV9KCZM9xpyQPx8/s4mpBBU7253DMg4xsYa2A38fw7c RjnIOoyyeJvzPuLXeFor6OYK8LnuOMXryEiDl4FH9zIylzXSRLH9N/PHoxeO+jtPYLFP BiNGh2CFHNUVBYCxXviZYhYO0wvGrVxDoYnXakKV+ZWiMSVkZM5zUCTY9pmq1p01Aouo 4mXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGftYvaKq0X0JrHfdp7qrZRR29S9oFl6zhysNSX0dQdDdbjzKVo ib4wezWbl+PNn6HmMliMELs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcuDmyBaPXba5hB8XBQ/mbLvybkgTs6YhJmjG8J8tqjS00RvWJkTJhNUKOpfn4+Jl6j/wz9Mw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:6547:: with SMTP id z68-v6mr24442356pfb.20.1533080348161; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aiede.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4187:1d6c:d3d6:9ce6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 84-v6sm37875504pfj.33.2018.07.31.16.39.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:39:06 -0700 From: Jonathan Nieder To: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Cc: Junio C Hamano , Michael Haggerty , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1404: increase core.packedRefsTimeout to avoid occasional test failure Message-ID: <20180731233906.GB113554@aiede.svl.corp.google.com> References: <20180731233248.25482-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180731233248.25482-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > While 3secs timeout seems plenty, and indeed is sufficient in most > cases, on rare occasions it's just not quite enough: I saw this test > fail in Travis CI build jobs two, maybe three times because 'git > update-ref' timed out. I suspect these tests will fail with valgrind (just because valgrind makes things super slow). Would it be safe to use timeout=-1? Thanks, Jonathan