From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul Smith" <paul@mad-scientist.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>,
"Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.19.0-rc0
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:16:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823021618.GA12052@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180823012343.GB92374@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:23:43PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Jeff King wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 23:03 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
> >>> static inline int hashcmp(const unsigned char *sha1, const unsigned
> >>> char *sha2)
> >>> {
> >>> + assert(the_hash_algo->rawsz == 20);
> >>> return memcmp(sha1, sha2, the_hash_algo->rawsz);
> >>> }
> [...]
> > The bigger questions are:
> >
> > - are we OK with such an assertion; and
> >
> > - does the assertion still give us the desired behavior when we add in
> > a branch for rawsz==32?
> >
> > And I think the answers for those are both "probably not".
>
> At this point in the release process, I think the answer to the first
> question is a pretty clear "yes".
>
> A ~10% increase in latency of some operations is quite significant, in
> exchange for no user benefit yet. We can continue to try to figure
> out how to convince compilers to generate good code for this (and
> that's useful), but in the meantime we should also do the simple thing
> to avoid the regression for users.
FWIW, it's not 10%. The best I measured was ~4% on a very
hashcmp-limited operation, and I suspect even that may be highly
dependent on the compiler. We might be able to improve more by
sprinkling more asserts around, but there are 75 mentions of
the_hash_algo->rawsz. I wouldn't want to an assert at each one.
I don't mind doing one or a handful of these asserts as part of v2.19 if
we want to try to reclaim those few percent. But I suspect the very
first commit in any further hash-transition work is just going to be to
rip them all out.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-20 22:13 [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.19.0-rc0 Junio C Hamano
2018-08-20 22:41 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-20 23:39 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-21 0:27 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-21 0:46 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-21 20:41 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-21 21:29 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 0:48 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-22 3:03 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 3:36 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 11:11 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-22 5:36 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-22 6:07 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 7:39 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-22 11:14 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-22 15:17 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 16:08 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-22 16:14 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-22 16:26 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 16:49 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-22 16:58 ` Duy Nguyen
2018-08-22 17:04 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-22 16:59 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-22 15:14 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 14:28 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-22 15:24 ` Jeff King
2018-08-22 12:42 ` Paul Smith
2018-08-22 15:23 ` Jeff King
2018-08-23 1:23 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-23 2:16 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-23 2:27 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-23 5:02 ` Jeff King
2018-08-23 5:09 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-23 5:10 ` Jonathan Nieder
2018-08-23 13:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-23 16:31 ` wide t/perf output, was " Jeff King
2018-08-23 3:47 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-23 5:04 ` Jeff King
2018-08-23 10:26 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-23 13:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-23 16:14 ` Jeff King
2018-08-23 23:30 ` Jacob Keller
2018-08-23 23:40 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 0:06 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 0:16 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 2:48 ` Jacob Keller
2018-08-24 2:59 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 6:45 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 11:04 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-27 19:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-23 18:53 ` Jeff King
2018-08-23 20:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-24 6:56 ` Jeff King
2018-08-24 7:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-24 16:45 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-25 8:26 ` Jeff King
2018-09-02 18:53 ` Kaartic Sivaraam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823021618.GA12052@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@mad-scientist.net \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).