From: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2020, #02; Thu, 5)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 16:13:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310161301.GA157628@cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqv9nh2wu9.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 03/06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 03/05, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> * tg/retire-scripted-stash (2020-03-05) 2 commits
> >> (merged to 'next' on 2020-03-05 at 8e82eb9dec)
> >> + stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting
> >> + stash: get git_stash_config at the top level
> >>
> >> "git stash" has kept an escape hatch to use the scripted version
> >> for a few releases, which got stale. It has been removed.
> >>
> >> Will merge to 'master'.
> >
> > I was thinking only getting this into a release after 2.26 dropped,
> > and have written the docs with that in mind. Not sure if this "Will
> > merge to 'master'" means that you were planning to get this into 2.26?
>
> Committed to merge to 'master' sometime in the future, but it still
> is not known if it will be before or after the upcoming release.
>
> > I have a slight preference for waiting until after the release to
> > merge this down, but I'm okay with doing it now.
>
> Being cautious is good. I do not think this is ultra-urgent; as you
> said in <20200303174613.3557960-2-t.gummerer@gmail.com>, the "bug"
> has been with us for a couple of releases already. I do not mind
> keeping it in 'next' and merge as a part of the first batch after
> the release.
I would prefer that, thanks!
> > If we want to do so
> > we need to tweak the description in 'Documentation/config/stash.txt'
> > to refer to 2.25 instead of 2.26.
> >
> > Either way, we'll need the patch below on top, as I made an
> > embarrassing copy-paste mistake. Sorry for the trouble.
>
> Heh, I think 8a2cd3f5 ("stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting",
> 2020-03-03) that is on 'next' already has it (and s/Variable/variable/
> casefix).
Ah great, thanks for catching this already. One less embarrassing
mistake of mine in Gits history :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 22:02 What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2020, #02; Thu, 5) Junio C Hamano
2020-03-05 22:08 ` Taylor Blau
2020-03-06 17:29 ` Thomas Gummerer
2020-03-06 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-10 16:13 ` Thomas Gummerer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200310161301.GA157628@cat \
--to=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).