git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 3/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:48:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200413164828.23260-4-worldhello.net@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200412133022.17590-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com>

From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>

Git calls an internal `execute_commands` function to handle commands
sent from client to `git-receive-pack`.  Regardless of what references
the user pushes, git creates or updates the corresponding references if
the user has write-permission.  A contributor who has no
write-permission, cannot push to the repository directly.  So, the
contributor has to write commits to an alternate location, and sends
pull request by emails or by other ways.  We call this workflow as a
distributed workflow.

It would be more convenient to work in a centralized workflow like what
Gerrit provided for some cases.  For example, a read-only user who
cannot push to a branch directly can run the following `git push`
command to push commits to a pseudo reference (has a prefix "refs/for/",
not "refs/heads/") to create a code review.

    git push origin \
        HEAD:refs/for/<branch-name>/<session>

The `<branch-name>` in the above example can be as simple as "master",
or a more complicated branch name like "foo/bar".  The `<session>` in
the above example command can be the local branch name of the client
side, such as "my/topic".

We cannot implement a centralized workflow elegantly by using
"pre-receive" + "post-receive", because Git will call the internal
function "execute_commands" to create references (even the special
pseudo reference) between these two hooks.  Even though we can delete
the temporarily created pseudo reference via the "post-receive" hook,
having a temporary reference is not safe for concurrent pushes.

So, add a filter and a new handler to support this kind of workflow.
The filter will check the prefix of the reference name, and if the
command has a special reference name, the filter will turn a specific
field (`run_proc_receive`) on for the command.  Commands with this filed
turned on will be executed by a new handler (an hook named
"proc-receive") instead of the internal `execute_commands` function.
We can use this "proc-receive" command to create pull requests or send
emails for code review.

Suggested by Junio, this "proc-receive" hook reads the commands,
push-options (optional), and send result using a protocol in pkt-line
format.  In the following example, The letter "S" stands for
"receive-pack" and letter "H" stands for the hook.

    # Version and features negotiation.
    S: PKT-LINE(version=1\0push-options atomic...)
    S: flush-pkt
    H: PKT-LINE(version=1\0push-options...)
    H: flush-pkt

    # Send commands from server to the hook.
    S: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref>)
    S: ... ...
    S: flush-pkt
    # Send push-options only if the 'push-options' feature is enabled.
    S: PKT-LINE(push-option)
    S: ... ...
    S: flush-pkt

    # Receive result from the hook.
    # OK, run this command successfully.
    H: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref> ok)
    # NO, I reject it.
    H: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref> ng <reason>)
    # Fall through, let 'receive-pack' to execute it.
    H: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref> ft)
    # OK, but has an alternate reference.  The alternate reference name
    # and other status are given in key=value pairs after the null
    # character.
    H: PKT-LINE(<old-oid> <new-oid> <ref> ok\0ref=refs/pull/123/head
                forced-update)
    H: ... ...
    H: flush-pkt

After receiving a command, the hook will execute the command, and may
create/update different reference.  For example, a command for a pseudo
reference "refs/for/master/topic" may create/update different reference
such as "refs/pull/123/head".  The alternate reference name and other
status are given in key-value pairs as extended status of the report
line.

The list of commands returned from "proc-receive" will replace the
relevant commands that are sent from user to "receive-pack", and
"receive-pack" will continue to run the "execute_commands" function and
other routines.  Finally, the result of the execution of these commands
will be reported to end user.

The reporting function from "receive-pack" to "send-pack" is also
extended using a backward compatible way by adding key-value pairs
after an null character, like:

    # OK, run this command successfully with optional extended-status.
    ok <reference>\0ref=refs/pull/123/head old-oid=...

    # NO, I reject it.
    ng <reference> <error message>

Parsing the extended status of the report lines for "send-pack" is not
implemented in this commit, so we can make a compatible test on old
version of a Git client.

Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com>
---
 Makefile                     |   1 +
 builtin/receive-pack.c       | 299 +++++++++++++++-
 t/helper/test-proc-receive.c | 178 +++++++++
 t/helper/test-tool.c         |   1 +
 t/helper/test-tool.h         |   1 +
 t/t5411/common-functions.sh  |  10 +-
 t/t5411/common-test-cases.sh | 673 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 1151 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 t/helper/test-proc-receive.c

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index ef1ff2228f..1c52c280ce 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@ TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-parse-pathspec-file.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-path-utils.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-pkt-line.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-prio-queue.o
+TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-proc-receive.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-progress.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-reach.o
 TEST_BUILTINS_OBJS += test-read-cache.o
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 2cc18bbffd..fd2dc23c2e 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
@@ -308,11 +308,15 @@ static void write_head_info(void)
 	packet_flush(1);
 }
 
+#define RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_SCHEDULED	1
+#define RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_RETURNED	2
 struct command {
 	struct command *next;
 	const char *error_string;
+	const char *extended_status;
 	unsigned int skip_update:1,
-		     did_not_exist:1;
+		     did_not_exist:1,
+		     run_proc_receive:2;
 	int index;
 	struct object_id old_oid;
 	struct object_id new_oid;
@@ -817,6 +821,250 @@ static int run_update_hook(struct command *cmd)
 	return finish_command(&proc);
 }
 
+static struct command *find_command_by_refname(const struct command *list,
+					       const char *refname)
+{
+	for (; list; list = list->next)
+		if (!strcmp(list->ref_name, refname))
+			return (struct command *)list;
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int read_proc_receive_report(struct packet_reader *reader,
+				    struct command *commands,
+				    struct strbuf *errmsg)
+{
+	struct command *cmd;
+	struct command *hint = NULL;
+	struct strbuf extended_status = STRBUF_INIT;
+	int code = 0;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		struct object_id old_oid, new_oid;
+		const char *refname;
+		const char *p;
+		char *status;
+		char *msg = NULL;
+		int len;
+
+		if (packet_reader_read(reader) != PACKET_READ_NORMAL)
+			break;
+		len = strlen(reader->line);
+		if (parse_oid_hex(reader->line, &old_oid, &p) ||
+		    *p++ != ' ' ||
+		    parse_oid_hex(p, &new_oid, &p) ||
+		    *p++ != ' ') {
+			strbuf_addf(errmsg, "proc-receive expected 'old new ref status [msg]', got '%s'\n",
+				    reader->line);
+			code = -1;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		refname = p;
+		status = strchr(p, ' ');
+		if (!status) {
+			strbuf_addf(errmsg, "proc-receive expected 'old new ref status [msg]', got '%s'\n",
+				    reader->line);
+			code = -1;
+			continue;
+		}
+		*status++ = '\0';
+		msg = strchr(status, ' ');
+		if (msg)
+			*msg++ = '\0';
+
+		/* first try searching at our hint, falling back to all refs */
+		if (hint)
+			hint = find_command_by_refname(hint, refname);
+		if (!hint)
+			hint = find_command_by_refname(commands, refname);
+		if (!hint) {
+			strbuf_addf(errmsg, "proc-receive reported status on unknown ref: %s\n",
+				    refname);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (!hint->run_proc_receive) {
+			strbuf_addf(errmsg, "proc-receive reported status on unexpected ref: %s\n",
+				    refname);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (!strcmp(status, "ng")) {
+			if (msg)
+				hint->error_string = xstrdup(msg);
+			else
+				hint->error_string = "failed";
+			code = -1;
+		} else if (!strcmp("ft", status)) {
+			/* Reset "run_proc_receive" field, and continue to run in "receive-pack" */
+			hint->run_proc_receive = 0;
+		} else if (strcmp("ok", status)) {
+			strbuf_addf(errmsg, "proc-receive reported bad status '%s' on ref '%s'\n",
+				    status, refname);
+			code = -1;
+			/* Skip marking it as RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_RETURNED */
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (reader->pktlen > len)
+			strbuf_addstr(&extended_status, (char *)reader->line + len + 1);
+		if (oidcmp(&hint->old_oid, &old_oid)) {
+			oidcpy(&hint->old_oid, &old_oid);
+			strbuf_addf(&extended_status, "%sold-oid=%s",
+				    extended_status.len > 0 ? " ": "",
+				    oid_to_hex(&old_oid));
+		}
+		if (oidcmp(&hint->new_oid, &new_oid)) {
+			oidcpy(&hint->new_oid, &new_oid);
+			strbuf_addf(&extended_status, "%snew-oid=%s",
+				    extended_status.len > 0 ? " ": "",
+				    oid_to_hex(&new_oid));
+		}
+		if (extended_status.len > 0)
+			hint->extended_status = strbuf_detach(&extended_status, NULL);
+		if (hint->run_proc_receive)
+			hint->run_proc_receive |= RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_RETURNED;
+	}
+
+	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next)
+		if (cmd->run_proc_receive && !cmd->error_string &&
+		    !(cmd->run_proc_receive & RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_RETURNED)) {
+		    cmd->error_string = "proc-receive failed to report status";
+		    code = -1;
+		}
+
+	return code;
+}
+
+static int run_proc_receive_hook(struct command *commands,
+				 const struct string_list *push_options)
+{
+	struct child_process proc = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
+	struct async muxer;
+	struct command *cmd;
+	const char *argv[2];
+	struct packet_reader reader;
+	struct strbuf cap = STRBUF_INIT;
+	struct strbuf errmsg = STRBUF_INIT;
+	int pr_use_push_options = 0;
+	int version = 0;
+	int code;
+
+	argv[0] = find_hook("proc-receive");
+	if (!argv[0]) {
+		rp_error("cannot find hook 'proc-receive'");
+		return -1;
+	}
+	argv[1] = NULL;
+
+	proc.argv = argv;
+	proc.in = -1;
+	proc.out = -1;
+	proc.trace2_hook_name = "proc-receive";
+
+	if (use_sideband) {
+		memset(&muxer, 0, sizeof(muxer));
+		muxer.proc = copy_to_sideband;
+		muxer.in = -1;
+		code = start_async(&muxer);
+		if (code)
+			return code;
+		proc.err = muxer.in;
+	} else {
+		proc.err = 0;
+	}
+
+	code = start_command(&proc);
+	if (code) {
+		if (use_sideband)
+			finish_async(&muxer);
+		return code;
+	}
+
+	sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
+
+	/* Version negotiaton */
+	packet_reader_init(&reader, proc.out, NULL, 0,
+			   PACKET_READ_CHOMP_NEWLINE |
+			   PACKET_READ_DIE_ON_ERR_PACKET);
+	if (use_atomic)
+		strbuf_addstr(&cap, " atomic");
+	if (use_push_options)
+		strbuf_addstr(&cap, " push-options");
+	if (cap.len) {
+		packet_write_fmt(proc.in, "version=1%c%s\n", '\0', cap.buf + 1);
+		strbuf_release(&cap);
+	} else {
+		packet_write_fmt(proc.in, "version=1\n");
+	}
+	packet_flush(proc.in);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		int linelen;
+
+		if (packet_reader_read(&reader) != PACKET_READ_NORMAL)
+			break;
+
+		if (reader.pktlen > 8 && starts_with(reader.line, "version=")) {
+			version = atoi(reader.line + 8);
+			linelen = strlen(reader.line);
+			if (linelen < reader.pktlen) {
+				const char *feature_list = reader.line + linelen + 1;
+				if (parse_feature_request(feature_list, "push-options"))
+					pr_use_push_options = 1;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (version != 1) {
+		strbuf_addf(&errmsg, "proc-receive version '%d' is not supported",
+			    version);
+		code = -1;
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+
+	/* Send commands */
+	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
+		if (!cmd->run_proc_receive || cmd->skip_update || cmd->error_string)
+			continue;
+		packet_write_fmt(proc.in, "%s %s %s",
+				 oid_to_hex(&cmd->old_oid),
+				 oid_to_hex(&cmd->new_oid),
+				 cmd->ref_name);
+	}
+	packet_flush(proc.in);
+
+	/* Send push options */
+	if (pr_use_push_options) {
+		struct string_list_item *item;
+
+		for_each_string_list_item(item, push_options)
+			packet_write_fmt(proc.in, "%s", item->string);
+		packet_flush(proc.in);
+	}
+
+	/* Read result from proc-receive */
+	code = read_proc_receive_report(&reader, commands, &errmsg);
+
+cleanup:
+	close(proc.in);
+	close(proc.out);
+	if (use_sideband)
+		finish_async(&muxer);
+	if (finish_command(&proc))
+		code = -1;
+	if (errmsg.len >0) {
+		char *p = errmsg.buf;
+
+		p += errmsg.len - 1;
+		if (*p == '\n')
+			*p = '\0';
+		rp_error("%s", errmsg.buf);
+		strbuf_release(&errmsg);
+	}
+	sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
+
+	return code;
+}
+
 static char *refuse_unconfigured_deny_msg =
 	N_("By default, updating the current branch in a non-bare repository\n"
 	   "is denied, because it will make the index and work tree inconsistent\n"
@@ -1392,7 +1640,7 @@ static void execute_commands_non_atomic(struct command *commands,
 	struct strbuf err = STRBUF_INIT;
 
 	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
-		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd))
+		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd) || cmd->run_proc_receive)
 			continue;
 
 		transaction = ref_transaction_begin(&err);
@@ -1432,7 +1680,7 @@ static void execute_commands_atomic(struct command *commands,
 	}
 
 	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
-		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd))
+		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd) || cmd->run_proc_receive)
 			continue;
 
 		cmd->error_string = update(cmd, si);
@@ -1468,6 +1716,7 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
 	struct iterate_data data;
 	struct async muxer;
 	int err_fd = 0;
+	int run_proc_receive = 0;
 
 	if (unpacker_error) {
 		for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next)
@@ -1497,6 +1746,21 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
 
 	reject_updates_to_hidden(commands);
 
+	/*
+	 * Try to find commands that have special prefix in their reference names,
+	 * and mark them to run an external "proc-receive" hook later.
+	 */
+	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
+		if (!should_process_cmd(cmd))
+			continue;
+
+		/* TODO: replace the fixed prefix by looking up git config variables. */
+		if (!strncmp(cmd->ref_name, "refs/for/", 9)) {
+			cmd->run_proc_receive = RUN_PROC_RECEIVE_SCHEDULED;
+			run_proc_receive = 1;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (run_receive_hook(commands, "pre-receive", 0, push_options)) {
 		for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
 			if (!cmd->error_string)
@@ -1523,6 +1787,12 @@ static void execute_commands(struct command *commands,
 	free(head_name_to_free);
 	head_name = head_name_to_free = resolve_refdup("HEAD", 0, NULL, NULL);
 
+	if (run_proc_receive &&
+	    run_proc_receive_hook(commands, push_options))
+		for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next)
+			if (!cmd->error_string  && (cmd->run_proc_receive || use_atomic))
+				cmd->error_string = "fail to run proc-receive hook";
+
 	if (use_atomic)
 		execute_commands_atomic(commands, si);
 	else
@@ -1899,12 +2169,23 @@ static void report(struct command *commands, const char *unpack_status)
 	packet_buf_write(&buf, "unpack %s\n",
 			 unpack_status ? unpack_status : "ok");
 	for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next) {
-		if (!cmd->error_string)
-			packet_buf_write(&buf, "ok %s\n",
-					 cmd->ref_name);
-		else
-			packet_buf_write(&buf, "ng %s %s\n",
-					 cmd->ref_name, cmd->error_string);
+		if (!cmd->error_string) {
+			if (cmd->extended_status)
+				packet_buf_write(&buf, "ok %s%c%s\n",
+						 cmd->ref_name, '\0',
+						 cmd->extended_status);
+			else
+				packet_buf_write(&buf, "ok %s\n",
+						 cmd->ref_name);
+		} else {
+			if (cmd->extended_status)
+				packet_buf_write(&buf, "ng %s %s%c%s\n",
+						 cmd->ref_name, cmd->error_string,
+						 '\0', cmd->extended_status);
+			else
+				packet_buf_write(&buf, "ng %s %s\n",
+						 cmd->ref_name, cmd->error_string);
+		}
 	}
 	packet_buf_flush(&buf);
 
diff --git a/t/helper/test-proc-receive.c b/t/helper/test-proc-receive.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c9f5c5aae4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/helper/test-proc-receive.c
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+#include "cache.h"
+#include "connect.h"
+#include "parse-options.h"
+#include "pkt-line.h"
+#include "sigchain.h"
+#include "string-list.h"
+#include "test-tool.h"
+
+static const char *proc_receive_usage[] = {
+	"test-tool proc-receive [<options>...]",
+	NULL
+};
+
+static int version = 1;
+static int verbose = 0;
+static int no_push_options = 0;
+static int use_atomic = 0;
+static int use_push_options = 0;
+static struct string_list returns = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
+
+struct command {
+	struct command *next;
+	const char *error_string;
+	unsigned int skip_update:1,
+		     did_not_exist:1;
+	int index;
+	struct object_id old_oid;
+	struct object_id new_oid;
+	char ref_name[FLEX_ARRAY]; /* more */
+};
+
+static void proc_receive_verison(struct packet_reader *reader) {
+	int server_version = 0;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		int linelen;
+
+		if (packet_reader_read(reader) != PACKET_READ_NORMAL)
+			break;
+
+		if (reader->pktlen > 8 && starts_with(reader->line, "version=")) {
+			server_version = atoi(reader->line+8);
+			linelen = strlen(reader->line);
+			if (linelen < reader->pktlen) {
+				const char *feature_list = reader->line + linelen + 1;
+				if (parse_feature_request(feature_list, "atomic"))
+					use_atomic= 1;
+				if (parse_feature_request(feature_list, "push-options"))
+					use_push_options = 1;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (server_version != 1)
+		die("bad protocol version: %d", server_version);
+
+	packet_write_fmt(1, "version=%d%c%s\n",
+			 version, '\0',
+			 use_push_options && !no_push_options ? "push-options": "");
+	packet_flush(1);
+}
+
+static void proc_receive_read_commands(struct packet_reader *reader,
+				       struct command **commands)
+{
+	struct command **tail = commands;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		struct object_id old_oid, new_oid;
+		struct command *cmd;
+		const char *refname;
+		const char *p;
+
+		if (packet_reader_read(reader) != PACKET_READ_NORMAL)
+			break;
+
+		if (parse_oid_hex(reader->line, &old_oid, &p) ||
+		    *p++ != ' ' ||
+		    parse_oid_hex(p, &new_oid, &p) ||
+		    *p++ != ' ')
+			die("protocol error: expected 'old new ref', got '%s'",
+			    reader->line);
+		refname = p;
+		FLEX_ALLOC_STR(cmd, ref_name, refname);
+		oidcpy(&cmd->old_oid, &old_oid);
+		oidcpy(&cmd->new_oid, &new_oid);
+
+		*tail = cmd;
+		tail = &cmd->next;
+	}
+}
+
+static void proc_receive_read_push_options(struct packet_reader *reader,
+					   struct string_list *options)
+{
+
+	if (no_push_options || !use_push_options)
+	       return;
+
+	while (1) {
+		if (packet_reader_read(reader) != PACKET_READ_NORMAL)
+			break;
+
+		string_list_append(options, reader->line);
+	}
+}
+
+int cmd__proc_receive(int argc, const char **argv)
+{
+	struct packet_reader reader;
+	struct command *commands = NULL;
+	struct string_list push_options = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
+	struct string_list_item *item;
+	struct option options[] = {
+		OPT_BOOL(0, "no-push-options", &no_push_options,
+			 "disable push options"),
+		OPT_STRING_LIST('r', "return", &returns, "old/new/ref/status/msg",
+				"return of results"),
+		OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose, "be verbose"),
+		OPT_INTEGER('V', "version", &version,
+			    "use this protocol version number"),
+		OPT_END()
+	};
+
+	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, "test-tools", options, proc_receive_usage, 0);
+	if (argc > 0)
+		usage_msg_opt("Too many arguments.", proc_receive_usage, options);
+
+	packet_reader_init(&reader, 0, NULL, 0,
+			   PACKET_READ_CHOMP_NEWLINE |
+			   PACKET_READ_DIE_ON_ERR_PACKET);
+
+	sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
+	proc_receive_verison(&reader);
+	proc_receive_read_commands(&reader, &commands);
+	proc_receive_read_push_options(&reader, &push_options);
+
+	if (verbose) {
+		struct command *cmd;
+
+		if (use_push_options || use_atomic)
+			fprintf(stderr, "proc-receive:%s%s\n",
+				use_atomic? " atomic": "",
+				use_push_options ? " push_options": "");
+
+		for (cmd = commands; cmd; cmd = cmd->next)
+			fprintf(stderr, "proc-receive< %s %s %s\n",
+				oid_to_hex(&cmd->old_oid),
+				oid_to_hex(&cmd->new_oid),
+				cmd->ref_name);
+
+		if (push_options.nr > 0)
+			for_each_string_list_item(item, &push_options)
+				fprintf(stderr, "proc-receive< %s\n", item->string);
+
+		if (returns.nr)
+			for_each_string_list_item(item, &returns)
+				fprintf(stderr, "proc-receive> %s\n", item->string);
+	}
+
+	if (returns.nr)
+		for_each_string_list_item(item, &returns) {
+			char *p;
+
+			p = strstr(item->string, "\\0");
+			if (p) {
+				*p = '\0';
+				p += 2;
+				packet_write_fmt(1, "%s%c%s\n", item->string, '\0', p);
+			} else {
+				packet_write_fmt(1, "%s\n", item->string);
+			}
+		}
+	packet_flush(1);
+	sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/t/helper/test-tool.c b/t/helper/test-tool.c
index 31eedcd241..f865433a61 100644
--- a/t/helper/test-tool.c
+++ b/t/helper/test-tool.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static struct test_cmd cmds[] = {
 	{ "path-utils", cmd__path_utils },
 	{ "pkt-line", cmd__pkt_line },
 	{ "prio-queue", cmd__prio_queue },
+	{ "proc-receive", cmd__proc_receive},
 	{ "progress", cmd__progress },
 	{ "reach", cmd__reach },
 	{ "read-cache", cmd__read_cache },
diff --git a/t/helper/test-tool.h b/t/helper/test-tool.h
index 4eb5e6609e..059008cf22 100644
--- a/t/helper/test-tool.h
+++ b/t/helper/test-tool.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int cmd__parse_pathspec_file(int argc, const char** argv);
 int cmd__path_utils(int argc, const char **argv);
 int cmd__pkt_line(int argc, const char **argv);
 int cmd__prio_queue(int argc, const char **argv);
+int cmd__proc_receive(int argc, const char **argv);
 int cmd__progress(int argc, const char **argv);
 int cmd__reach(int argc, const char **argv);
 int cmd__read_cache(int argc, const char **argv);
diff --git a/t/t5411/common-functions.sh b/t/t5411/common-functions.sh
index 4337b10c8c..1fbd24dbaf 100644
--- a/t/t5411/common-functions.sh
+++ b/t/t5411/common-functions.sh
@@ -34,8 +34,11 @@ create_commits_in () {
 # Format the output of git-push, git-show-ref and other commands to make a
 # user-friendly and stable text.  We can easily prepare the expect text
 # without having to worry about future changes of the commit ID and spaces
-# of the output.  We also replce single quotes with double quotes, because
-# it is boring to prepare unquoted single quotes in expect text.
+# of the output.  Single quotes are replaced with double quotes, because
+# it is boring to prepare unquoted single quotes in expect text.  We also
+# remove some locale error messages, which break test if we turn on
+# `GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=true` in order to test unintentional translations
+# on plumbing commands.
 make_user_friendly_and_stable_output_common () {
 	sed \
 		-e "s/  *\$//" \
@@ -46,5 +49,6 @@ make_user_friendly_and_stable_output_common () {
 		-e "s/$TAG/<TAG-v123>/g" \
 		-e "s/$ZERO_OID/<ZERO-OID>/g" \
 		-e "s/$(echo $A | cut -c1-7)[0-9a-f]*/<OID-A>/g" \
-		-e "s/$(echo $B | cut -c1-7)[0-9a-f]*/<OID-B>/g"
+		-e "s/$(echo $B | cut -c1-7)[0-9a-f]*/<OID-B>/g" \
+		-e "/^error: / d"
 }
diff --git a/t/t5411/common-test-cases.sh b/t/t5411/common-test-cases.sh
index 23655846e4..fe970df755 100644
--- a/t/t5411/common-test-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t5411/common-test-cases.sh
@@ -41,3 +41,676 @@ test_expect_success "normal git-push command" '
 	EOF
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)  tags/v123  refs/review/master/topic(A)  a/b/c(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	(
+		cd "$upstream" &&
+		git update-ref -d refs/review/master/topic &&
+		git update-ref -d refs/tags/v123 &&
+		git update-ref -d refs/heads/a/b/c
+	)
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       next(A)  refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: no hook, fail to push special ref" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:next \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: error: cannot find hook "proc-receive"
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> next
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (fail to run proc-receive hook)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)             next(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	git -C "$upstream" update-ref -d refs/heads/next
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push --atomic: (B)                   next(A)  refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: no hook, fail all for atomic push" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push --atomic origin \
+		$B:master \
+		HEAD:next \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic >out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: error: cannot find hook "proc-receive"
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] <COMMIT-B> -> master (fail to run proc-receive hook)
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> next (fail to run proc-receive hook)
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (fail to run proc-receive hook)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (unknown version)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v --version 2
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: bad protocol (unknown version)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+
+	# Check status report for git-push
+	sed -n \
+		-e "/^To / { s/   */ /g; p; }" \
+		-e "/^ / { s/   */ /g; p; }" \
+		<actual >actual-report &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (fail to run proc-receive hook)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual-report &&
+
+	# Check error message from "receive-pack", but ignore unstable fatal error
+	# message ("remote: fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly") which
+	# is different from the remote HTTP server with different locale settings.
+	sed -n -e "/^remote: error:/ { s/   */ /g; p; }" \
+		<actual >actual-error &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: error: proc-receive version "2" is not supported
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual-error &&
+
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (no report)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       next(A)  refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: bad protocol (no report)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/heads/next \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic >out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> next
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)             next(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	git -C "$upstream" update-ref -d refs/heads/next
+
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (bad oid)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "bad-id new-id ref ok"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: bad protocol (bad oid)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic\
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> bad-id new-id ref ok
+	remote: error: proc-receive expected "old new ref status [msg]", got "bad-id new-id ref ok"
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (no status)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/master/topic"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: bad protocol (no status)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: error: proc-receive expected "old new ref status [msg]", got "<ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic"
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (unknown status)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/master/topic xx msg"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: bad protocol (unknown status)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+			HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+			>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic xx msg
+	remote: error: proc-receive reported bad status "xx" on ref "refs/for/master/topic"
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (ng)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/master/topic ng"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: fail to update (ng)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ng
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (failed)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (ng message)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/master/topic ng error msg"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: fail to update (ng message)" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ng error msg
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (error msg)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (unexpected ref)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/heads/master ok"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         : (B)                   refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: report on unexpected ref" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		$B:refs/heads/master \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master ok
+	remote: error: proc-receive reported status on unexpected ref: refs/heads/master
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 <OID-A>..<OID-B> <COMMIT-B> -> master
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(B)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	git -C "$upstream" update-ref refs/heads/master $A
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (ok)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/master/topic ok"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: ok" '
+	git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ok
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/a/b/c/my/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: failed to report status" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/a/b/c/my/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/my/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/my/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ok
+	remote: error: proc-receive reported status on unknown ref: refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/a/b/c/my/topic (proc-receive failed to report status)
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push -o ...  :                       refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: not support push options" '
+	test_must_fail git -C workbench push \
+		-o issue=123 \
+		-o reviewer=user1 \
+		origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	test_i18ngrep "fatal: the receiving end does not support push options" \
+		actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "enable push options" '
+	git -C "$upstream" config receive.advertisePushOptions true
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push -o ...  :                       next(A)  refs/for/master/topic
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: push with options" '
+	git -C workbench push \
+		--atomic \
+		-o issue=123 \
+		-o reviewer=user1 \
+		origin \
+		HEAD:refs/heads/next \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive: atomic push_options
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive< issue=123
+	remote: proc-receive< reviewer=user1
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ok
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> next
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)             next(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	git -C "$upstream" update-ref -d refs/heads/next
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (ft)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $B refs/for/master/topic ft"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/master/topic(B)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: fall throught, let receive-pack to execute" '
+	git -C workbench push origin \
+		$B:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic ft
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new reference] <COMMIT-B> -> refs/for/master/topic
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)             refs/for/master/topic(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+test_expect_success "cleanup" '
+	git -C "$upstream" update-ref -d refs/for/master/topic
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook (with extended status)" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/a/b/c/topic ok" \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/next/topic ok\0ref=refs/pull/123/head" \
+		-r "$B $A refs/for/master/topic ok\0ref=refs/pull/124/head forced-update"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         :                       refs/for/next/topic(A)  refs/for/a/b/c/topic(A)  refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: report with extended status" '
+	git -C workbench push origin \
+		HEAD:refs/for/next/topic \
+		HEAD:refs/for/a/b/c/topic \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/topic
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/topic
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/topic ok
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic ok\0ref=refs/pull/123/head
+	remote: proc-receive> <COMMIT-B> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic ok\0ref=refs/pull/124/head forced-update
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/a/b/c/topic
+	remote: post-receive< <COMMIT-B> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/next/topic
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/a/b/c/topic
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success "setup proc-receive hook" '
+	write_script "$upstream/hooks/proc-receive" <<-EOF
+	printf >&2 "# proc-receive hook\n"
+	test-tool proc-receive -v \
+		-r "$ZERO_OID $A refs/for/next/topic ok" \
+		-r "$A $B refs/for/master/topic ok"
+	EOF
+'
+
+# Refs of upstream : master(A)
+# Refs of workbench: master(A)  tags/v123
+# git push         : (B)                   bar(A)  baz(A)  refs/for/next/topic(A)  foo(A)  refs/for/master/topic(A)
+test_expect_success "proc-receive: report update of mixed refs" '
+	git -C workbench push origin \
+		$B:refs/heads/master \
+		HEAD:refs/heads/bar \
+		HEAD:refs/heads/baz \
+		HEAD:refs/for/next/topic \
+		HEAD:refs/heads/foo \
+		HEAD:refs/for/master/topic \
+		>out 2>&1 &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	remote: # pre-receive hook
+	remote: pre-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/bar
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/baz
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/foo
+	remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: # proc-receive hook
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: proc-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
+	remote: proc-receive> <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic ok
+	remote: proc-receive> <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic ok
+	remote: # post-receive hook
+	remote: post-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/bar
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/baz
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/next/topic
+	remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/foo
+	remote: post-receive< <COMMIT-A> <COMMIT-B> refs/for/master/topic
+	To <URL/of/upstream.git>
+	 <OID-A>..<OID-B> <COMMIT-B> -> master
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> bar
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> baz
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/next/topic
+	 * [new branch] HEAD -> foo
+	 * [new reference] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	git -C "$upstream" show-ref >out &&
+	make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
+	cat >expect <<-EOF &&
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/bar
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/baz
+	<COMMIT-A> refs/heads/foo
+	<COMMIT-B> refs/heads/master
+	EOF
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
-- 
2.24.1.15.g448c31058d.agit.4.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-13 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 266+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 11:33 [PATCH 0/7] New execute-commands hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] receive-pack: new external execute-commands hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] receive-pack: feed all commands to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] receive-pack: try `execute-commands --pre-receive` Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] receive-pack: read env from execute-commands output Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] receive-pack: new config receive.executeCommandsHookRefs Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 11:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] hook: add document and example for "execute-commands" hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-04 20:39 ` [PATCH 0/7] New execute-commands hook for centralized workflow Junio C Hamano
2020-03-05 16:51   ` Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 14:56     ` [PATCH v2 0/5] New proc-receive " Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 14:56     ` [PATCH v2 1/5] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-09 17:12       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-10  6:03         ` Jiang Xin
2020-03-13 12:23           ` [PATCH v3 0/4] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 0/5] " Jiang Xin
2020-03-25  5:19               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 1/5] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-03-25  6:04               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 2/5] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 14:36               ` [PATCH 0/3] Never report references we not push Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:33                 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:35                   ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] fix git-push porcelain output and atomic report issue Jiang Xin
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 " Jiang Xin
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 1/5] send-pack: fix inconsistent porcelain output Jiang Xin
2020-04-17 19:51                       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 2/5] t5543: never report what we do not push Jiang Xin
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 3/5] send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properly Jiang Xin
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 4/5] transport-helper: mark failure for atomic push Jiang Xin
2020-04-17  9:45                     ` [PATCH v4 5/5] transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push() Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 1/5] send-pack: fix inconsistent porcelain output Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] t5543: never report what we do not push Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 3/5] send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properly Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 4/5] transport-helper: mark failure for atomic push Jiang Xin
2020-04-16 16:24                   ` [PATCH v3 5/5] transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push() Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:33                 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t5543: never report what we do not push Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:33                 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properly Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:33                 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] transport-helper: mark failure for atomic push Jiang Xin
2020-03-29 14:33                 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] transport-helper: new method reject_atomic_push() Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 14:36               ` [PATCH 1/3] t5543: never report what we do not push Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 15:05                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-26  2:25                   ` Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 14:36               ` [PATCH 2/3] send-pack: mark failure of atomic push properly Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 15:15                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-25 14:36               ` [PATCH 3/3] transport-helper: enforce atomic in push_refs_with_push Jiang Xin
2020-03-25 15:32                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 3/5] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 4/5] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-03-22 13:18             ` [PATCH v4 5/5] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-03-13 12:23           ` [PATCH v3 1/4] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-13 12:23           ` [PATCH v3 2/4] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-03-13 12:23           ` [PATCH v3 3/4] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-03-13 12:23           ` [PATCH v3 4/4] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 14:56     ` [PATCH v2 2/5] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 15:38     ` [PATCH v2 3/5] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 15:38     ` [PATCH v2 4/5] receive-pack: read env from proc-receive output Jiang Xin
2020-03-08 15:38     ` [PATCH v2 5/5] hook: add document and example for "proc-receive" hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-03-31  0:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-31  0:21   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-03-30 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 18:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 " Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 " Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 0/6] " Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 0/8] " Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 0/7] " Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 2/7] connect: export parse_feature_value() Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` Jiang Xin [this message]
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 4/7] send-pack: extension for client-side status report Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 5/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 6/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 16:48             ` [PATCH v11 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 1/8] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 20:26             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-13 11:15               ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 2/8] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 21:30             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-13 10:58               ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-13 21:50                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 0/7] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 0/8] " Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 1/8] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 2/8] connect: export parse_feature_value() Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 3/8] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 4/8] send-pack: extension for client-side status report Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 5/8] receive-pack: feed extended_status to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 6/8] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 7/8] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-18 16:03                     ` [PATCH v13 8/8] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 2/7] connect: export parse_feature_value() Jiang Xin
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 3/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-15 15:48                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-15 15:55                       ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-15 18:34                         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-27 17:00                           ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-29  7:56                             ` Jeff King
2020-04-30 15:33                               ` Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 0/7] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow Jiang Xin
2020-05-06 23:14                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-07  1:37                                     ` Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 11:18                                       ` Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 " Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 00/11] " Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 00/10] " Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 " Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 " Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 19:57                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 01/10] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 02/10] t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 03/10] receive-pack: add new " Jiang Xin
2020-11-04 22:15                                               ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-11-04 22:58                                                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-11-05 14:54                                                 ` Jiang Xin
2020-11-05 15:23                                                   ` [RFC PATCH] t5411: fix broken pipe write error on proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-11-05 19:14                                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-07  2:57                                                       ` [PATCH] t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken test Jiang Xin
2020-11-09  7:29                                                         ` Jiang Xin
2020-11-09 10:58                                                           ` [PATCH v2] " Jiang Xin
2020-11-09 20:59                                                             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-09 23:12                                                               ` Jeff King
2020-11-09 23:22                                                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-10  0:03                                                                   ` Jeff King
2020-11-10 11:49                                                                 ` Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 12:01                                                                   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t5411: refactor make_user_friendly_and_stable_output Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 20:51                                                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-11 11:08                                                                       ` Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 12:01                                                                   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] receive-pack: gently write messages to proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 21:52                                                                     ` Jeff King
2020-11-11 11:03                                                                       ` Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 21:00                                                                   ` [PATCH v2] t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken test Junio C Hamano
2020-11-10 21:13                                                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-11 11:31                                                                   ` [PATCH v4 0/3] jx/t5411-flake-fix Jiang Xin
2020-11-11 11:32                                                                   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] t5411: new helper filter_out_user_friendly_and_stable_output Jiang Xin
2020-11-11 11:32                                                                   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] receive-pack: gently write messages to proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-11-11 11:32                                                                   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] receive-pack: use default version 0 for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-11-10 11:44                                                               ` [PATCH v2] t5411: consistent result for proc-receive broken test Jiang Xin
2020-11-05 18:39                                                   ` [PATCH v19 03/10] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Junio C Hamano
2021-01-17 22:21                                               ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-01-18  8:24                                                 ` Jiang Xin
2021-01-20 12:28                                                   ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-01-21  2:21                                                     ` Jiang Xin
2021-01-21  6:12                                                       ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-01-18 13:30                                                 ` [PATCH 1/2] t5411: remove file after use to prevent overwriting Jiang Xin
2021-01-18 18:21                                                   ` Johannes Sixt
2021-01-19  0:48                                                     ` Jiang Xin
2021-01-19 10:24                                                     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] t5411 out file overwrite fix Jiang Xin
2021-01-19 10:24                                                     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] t5411: use different out file to prevent overwriting Jiang Xin
2021-01-20 12:49                                                       ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-01-21  1:59                                                         ` Jiang Xin
2021-01-21  2:53                                                         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] use unique out file in t5411 Jiang Xin
2021-02-11 21:52                                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-13 15:13                                                             ` Jiang Xin
2021-01-21  2:53                                                         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] t5411: use different out file to prevent overwriting Jiang Xin
2021-01-21  2:53                                                         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] t5411: refactor check of refs using test_cmp_refs Jiang Xin
2021-01-19 10:24                                                     ` [PATCH v2 " Jiang Xin
2021-01-18 13:30                                                 ` [PATCH " Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 04/10] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 05/10] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 06/10] doc: add document for capability report-status-v2 Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 07/10] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 08/10] t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branches Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 09/10] transport: parse report options for tracking refs Jiang Xin
2020-08-27 15:45                                             ` [PATCH v19 10/10] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 01/10] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 02/10] t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 03/10] receive-pack: add new " Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 04/10] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 05/10] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 06/10] doc: add document for capability report-status-v2 Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:41                                           ` [PATCH v18 07/10] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:42                                           ` [PATCH v18 08/10] t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branches Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:42                                           ` [PATCH v18 09/10] transport: parse report options for tracking refs Jiang Xin
2020-08-24 17:42                                           ` [PATCH v18 10/10] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 01/10] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 02/10] t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 03/10] receive-pack: add new " Jiang Xin
2020-08-17 20:53                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 04/10] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-08-17 21:12                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 05/10] doc: add document for capability report-status-v2 Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 06/10] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-08-17 21:15                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 07/10] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-08-17 21:25                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 08/10] t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branches Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 09/10] transport: parse report options for tracking refs Jiang Xin
2020-08-15 17:17                                         ` [PATCH v17 10/10] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 01/11] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 02/11] t5411: add basic test cases for proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 03/11] receive-pack: add new " Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 04/11] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 05/11] doc: add document for capability report-status-v2 Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 06/11] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 07/11] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 08/11] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 09/11] t5411: test updates of remote-tracking branches Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 10/11] transport: parse report options for tracking refs Jiang Xin
2020-05-18  9:40                                       ` [PATCH v16 11/11] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 2/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 3/7] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 4/7] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 5/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 6/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 16:10                                     ` [PATCH v15 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 2/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 3/7] New capability "report-status-v2" for git-push Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 15:25                                   ` [PATCH v14 8/7] fixup! " Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 4/7] receive-pack: feed report options to post-receive Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 5/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 6/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-05-05 14:41                                 ` [PATCH v14 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-05-07 17:27                                 ` [PATCH v12 3/7] receive-pack: add new " Jeff King
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 4/7] send-pack: extension for client-side status report Jiang Xin
2020-04-15 20:36                     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 5/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 6/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-14 12:32                   ` [PATCH v12 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 3/8] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 21:38             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-13 11:16               ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 4/8] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 21:46             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-13 11:16               ` Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 5/8] connect: export parse_feature_value() Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 6/8] receive-pack: extension for server-side report Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 7/8] send-pack: extension for client-side status report Jiang Xin
2020-04-12 13:30           ` [PATCH v10 8/8] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 1/6] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 2/6] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 3/6] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 4/6] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 5/6] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-04-07 12:08         ` [PATCH v9 6/6] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 2/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 3/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 4/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 5/7] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 6/7] t5412: test the proc-receive hook on HTTP protocol Jiang Xin
2020-04-04 13:43       ` [PATCH v8 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 2/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 3/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 4/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 5/7] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 6/7] t5412: test proc-receive hook on HTTP protocol Jiang Xin
2020-04-03 16:08     ` [PATCH v7 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] transport: not report a non-head push as a branch Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] receive-pack: add new proc-receive hook Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] refs.c: refactor to reuse ref_is_hidden() Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] receive-pack: new config receive.procReceiveRefs Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] receive-pack: refactor report for proc-receive Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] t5412: test proc-receive hook on HTTP protocol Jiang Xin
2020-04-02 16:35 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] doc: add documentation for the proc-receive hook Jiang Xin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200413164828.23260-4-worldhello.net@gmail.com \
    --to=worldhello.net@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).