From: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Brandon Williams <bwilliamseng@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] t1450: increase test coverage of in-tree d/f detection
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 06:20:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521102053.GA578930@generichostname> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <106c58e1-9c74-46e3-c83a-88eee114d9d6@web.de>
Hi René,
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:52:28AM +0200, René Scharfe wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t1450-fsck.sh b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> index 91a6e34f38..9640ac8ff2 100755
> --- a/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> +++ b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> @@ -257,21 +257,33 @@ test_expect_success 'tree object with duplicate entries' '
> test_i18ngrep "error in tree .*contains duplicate file entries" out
> '
>
> -test_expect_success 'tree object with dublicate names' '
> - test_when_finished "remove_object \$blob" &&
> - test_when_finished "remove_object \$tree" &&
> - test_when_finished "remove_object \$badtree" &&
> - blob=$(echo blob | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
> - printf "100644 blob %s\t%s\n" $blob x.2 >tree &&
> - tree=$(git mktree <tree) &&
> - printf "100644 blob %s\t%s\n" $blob x.1 >badtree &&
> - printf "100644 blob %s\t%s\n" $blob x >>badtree &&
> - printf "040000 tree %s\t%s\n" $tree x >>badtree &&
> - badtree=$(git mktree <badtree) &&
> - test_must_fail git fsck 2>out &&
> - test_i18ngrep "$badtree" out &&
> - test_i18ngrep "error in tree .*contains duplicate file entries" out
> -'
> +check_duplicate_names () {
> + expect=$1 &&
> + shift &&
> + names=$@ &&
It doesn't really make sense to use $@ here since we're not using the
argument list behaviour of $@; we're just expanding it normally. I would
replace this with $* instead.
> + test_expect_$expect "tree object with duplicate names: $names" '
> + test_when_finished "remove_object \$blob" &&
> + test_when_finished "remove_object \$tree" &&
> + test_when_finished "remove_object \$badtree" &&
> + blob=$(echo blob | git hash-object -w --stdin) &&
> + printf "100644 blob %s\t%s\n" $blob x.2 >tree &&
> + tree=$(git mktree <tree) &&
> + for name in $names
> + do
> + case "$name" in
> + */) printf "040000 tree %s\t%s\n" $tree "${name%/}" ;;
> + *) printf "100644 blob %s\t%s\n" $blob "$name" ;;
> + esac
> + done >badtree &&
> + badtree=$(git mktree <badtree) &&
> + test_must_fail git fsck 2>out &&
> + test_i18ngrep "$badtree" out &&
> + test_i18ngrep "error in tree .*contains duplicate file entries" out
> + '
> +}
> +
> +check_duplicate_names success x x.1 x/
> +check_duplicate_names success x x.1.2 x.1/ x/
>
> test_expect_success 'unparseable tree object' '
> test_oid_cache <<-\EOF &&
> --
> 2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-21 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-09 6:19 invalid tree and commit object Brandon Williams
2020-05-09 10:16 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-09 7:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-05-09 11:51 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-09 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-09 19:24 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-09 20:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-10 9:07 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-10 16:12 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-11 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-13 16:27 ` Brandon Williams
2020-05-21 9:51 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] fsck: fix a typo in a comment René Scharfe
2020-05-21 10:10 ` Denton Liu
2020-05-21 11:15 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/4] t1450: increase test coverage of in-tree d/f detection René Scharfe
2020-05-21 10:20 ` Denton Liu [this message]
2020-05-21 13:31 ` René Scharfe
2020-05-21 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/4] t1450: demonstrate undetected in-tree d/f conflict René Scharfe
2020-05-21 9:52 ` [PATCH 4/4] fsck: detect more in-tree d/f conflicts René Scharfe
2020-05-10 16:37 ` invalid tree and commit object Junio C Hamano
2020-05-21 9:51 ` René Scharfe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200521102053.GA578930@generichostname \
--to=liu.denton@gmail.com \
--cc=bwilliamseng@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).