From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBDFC433E0 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1013520734 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726833AbgFPHnU (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 03:43:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43166 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725843AbgFPHnT (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jun 2020 03:43:19 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCD9AF8F; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 07:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 09:43:16 +0200 From: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Such=E1nek?= To: demerphq Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= Augusto Vianna , konstantin@linuxfoundation.org, Johannes Schindelin , don@goodman-wilson.com, Git , newren@gmail.com, philipoakley@iee.email, "brian m. carlson" , Simon Pieters , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: Rename offensive terminology (master) Message-ID: <20200616074316.GA21462@kitsune.suse.cz> References: <20200614181906.u42tuny3eipvhd46@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:36:59AM +0200, demerphq wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 20:24, Sérgio Augusto Vianna > wrote: > > > > Ok, can you show me a single instance where "master" was confusing or > > not descriptive enough? > > A: "No you need to fetch master from the remote, then you need to > merge it to your local master and then push it to the master master". > B: "remote master, local master and master master. wtf kind of master is that?" Which falls on the wording of the FAQ, not the terminology itself. If you were confused I am sure there are ways to bring this up and even submit changes. Thanks Michal