Git Mailing List Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] t6300: fix issues related to %(contents:size)
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:30:04 -0400
Message-ID: <20200731203004.GA1440843@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpn8b30zp.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:04:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Definitely fixes the issue, though I wonder:
> >
> >> -		echo $expect >expected
> >> -		test_expect_${4:-sucess} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
> >> +		echo $expect >expect
> >> +		test_expect_${4:-success} $PREREQ "basic atom: $1 contents:size" '
> >>  			git for-each-ref --format="%(contents:size)" "$ref" >actual &&
> >>  			test_cmp expect actual
> >>  		'
> >
> > Should we instead switch the test_cmp to look at "expected" to be
> > consistent with the rest of the tests in this file?
> 
> If I recall correctly, "expect vs actual" were more common when I
> counted across all the tests last time.  Matching local convention
> is fine, though.

Yes, I agree that "expect" is where we should be heading overall. I
think matching local convention is best here to avoid introducing new
mistakes like this one, but I wouldn't be opposed to somebody switching
out s/expected/expect/ in the whole file.

-Peff

  reply index

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-07 17:40 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47     ` Christian Couder
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documentation: clarify 'complete message' Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:32   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 17:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-07 19:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-09  0:14     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-09  8:10       ` Christian Couder
2020-07-09 13:47         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-07 22:21   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-08 23:05   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-10 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:24     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-10 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-10 20:38     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-16 12:19   ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19     ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: clarify %(contents:XXXX) doc Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19     ` [PATCH v5 2/3] t6300: test refs pointing to tree and blob Christian Couder
2020-07-16 12:19     ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Christian Couder
2020-07-31 17:37       ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:45         ` [PATCH v1] t6300: fix issues related to %(contents:size) Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 17:47           ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 18:24             ` Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 20:04             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:30               ` Jeff King [this message]
2020-07-31 18:26           ` [PATCH v2] " Alban Gruin
2020-07-31 19:15             ` Jeff King
2020-07-31 17:45         ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ref-filter: add support for %(contents:size) Jeff King
2020-07-31 20:12           ` Christian Couder
2020-07-31 20:30             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-07-31 20:40               ` Jeff King
2020-07-16 17:48     ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Add support for %(contents:size) in ref-filter Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200731203004.GA1440843@coredump.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=alban.gruin@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Mailing List Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/git/0 git/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 git git/ https://lore.kernel.org/git \
		git@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index git

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.git


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git