archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] UNLEAK style fixes
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:54:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Although we introduced UNLEAK() long ago, I don't know that anybody has
really made a concerted effort to annotate enough variables to make
running a leak-checker useful. So I haven't paid too much attention to
its use.

But a few people have added some annotations, and I think some of them
aren't great examples. So I decided to clean them up. This by definition
has no impact on regular builds (since UNLEAK is a noop there), but even
in leak-checking builds should give no behavior change.

Another category that I was tempted to change is when variables _could_
be freed, but we just don't bother to do so. E.g., at the end of
bugreport.c, we have:

  return !!launch_editor(report_path.buf, NULL, NULL);

Using UNLEAK(report_path) makes sense; we can't free it because we're
passing it to a function that runs until program end. But we _could_
free "buffer" here, which isn't otherwise used again (i.e., that could
be strbuf_release() instead of UNLEAK).

But that does have a run-time cost (we'd actually free the memory, even
though we could just exit and let the OS handle it). My guess is that
it's not a measurable cost, and the code might be cleaner to actually
clean up instead of sprinkling more UNLEAKs around. But until we're
actually pushing forward with a real effort to get a leak-checker
running clean, I don't see much point in doing one or the other.

(As a side note, if we want to declare UNLEAK() a failure because nobody
cares enough to really use it, I'm OK with that, too).

  [1/2]: stop calling UNLEAK() before die()
  [2/2]: ls-remote: simplify UNLEAK() usage

 bugreport.c         | 4 +---
 builtin/ls-remote.c | 8 +++-----
 midx.c              | 8 ++------
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-13 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-13 15:54 Jeff King [this message]
2020-08-13 15:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] stop calling UNLEAK() before die() Jeff King
2020-08-13 18:08   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-14 10:17     ` Jeff King
2020-08-13 15:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] ls-remote: simplify UNLEAK() usage Jeff King
2020-08-13 18:11   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-13 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/2] UNLEAK style fixes Eric Sunshine
2020-08-14 10:34   ` Jeff King
2020-08-14 16:23     ` Eric Sunshine

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] UNLEAK style fixes' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).