git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
To: rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, szeder.dev@gmail.com, peff@peff.net,
	jonathantanmy@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed`
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:50:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414235027.4064035-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414191403.4387-2-rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>

> The `git repack -d` command will remove any packfile that becomes
> redundant after repacking, and then call  `git pruned-packed` for
> pruning any unpacked objects.

s/pruned-packed/prune-packed/ (note that there is no "d" after "prune")
throughout this commit message.

Also, if there are any objects pruned, they are packed objects, not
unpacked objects. Maybe better to say "...for pruning any objects
already in packs".

> diff --git a/t/t7700-repack.sh b/t/t7700-repack.sh
> index 25b235c063..728a16ad97 100755
> --- a/t/t7700-repack.sh
> +++ b/t/t7700-repack.sh
> @@ -127,12 +127,7 @@ test_expect_success 'packed unreachable obs in alternate ODB are not loosened' '
>  	git reset --hard HEAD^ &&
>  	test_tick &&
>  	git reflog expire --expire=$test_tick --expire-unreachable=$test_tick --all &&
> -	# The pack-objects call on the next line is equivalent to
> -	# git repack -A -d without the call to prune-packed
> -	git pack-objects --honor-pack-keep --non-empty --all --reflog \
> -	    --unpack-unreachable </dev/null pack &&
> -	rm -f .git/objects/pack/* &&
> -	mv pack-* .git/objects/pack/ &&
> +	git repack -A -d --no-prune-packed &&

This is great!

> +test_expect_success '-A -d and --no-prune-packed do not remove loose objects' '
> +	test_create_repo repo &&
> +	test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
> +	test_commit -C repo commit &&
> +	git -C repo repack -A -d --no-prune-packed &&
> +	git -C repo count-objects -v >out &&
> +	grep "^prune-packable: 3" out
> +'

As for the test description, I would prefer "...do not remove loose
objects already in packs".

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 23:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-03  9:04 rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-05  1:02 ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-07 21:17   ` Jeff King
2021-04-08  0:02     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-08  0:35       ` Jeff King
2021-04-12  7:09     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-12 21:36     ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12 21:49       ` Bryan Turner
2021-04-12 23:51         ` Jeff King
2021-04-12 23:47       ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:12         ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:15           ` [PATCH 1/3] is_promisor_object(): free tree buffer after parsing Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:17             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-14  5:18               ` Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:16           ` [PATCH 2/3] lookup_unknown_object(): take a repository argument Jeff King
2021-04-13  7:17           ` [PATCH 3/3] revision: avoid parsing with --exclude-promisor-objects Jeff King
2021-04-13 20:22             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-13 18:10           ` [PATCH 0/3] low-hanging performance fruit with promisor packs SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14 17:14           ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-14 19:22           ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-13 18:05         ` rather slow 'git repack' in 'blob:none' partial clones SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-14  5:14           ` Jeff King
2021-04-11 10:59   ` SZEDER Gábor
2021-04-12  7:53     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 1/2] repack: teach --no-prune-packed to skip `git prune-packed` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 23:50     ` Jonathan Tan [this message]
2021-04-18 14:15       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 19:14   ` [PATCH 2/2] repack: avoid loosening promisor pack objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-15  1:04     ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-15  3:51       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:03         ` Jeff King
2021-04-15  9:05       ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  7:12       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-15 18:06     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-18  8:40       ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-14 22:10   ` [PATCH 0/2] prevent `repack` to unpack and delete promisor objects Junio C Hamano
2021-04-15  9:15   ` Jeff King
2021-04-18  8:20     ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Rafael Silva
2021-04-18 13:57     ` [PATCH v2 1/1] repack: avoid loosening promisor objects in partial clones Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 19:15       ` Jonathan Tan
2021-04-21 18:54         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-19 23:09       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-04-21 19:25         ` Rafael Silva
2021-04-21 19:32     ` [PATCH v3] " Rafael Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210414235027.4064035-1-jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --to=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).