From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E055C433F5 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2021 06:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232251AbhLMGcF (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 01:32:05 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232227AbhLMGcC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2021 01:32:02 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4514C061751 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:32:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id k21so17344733ioh.4 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:32:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qavUlmxKqwwH50whFgJkIc5I+rxBkwSULiHgjSYOAqY=; b=cW6iigM5TJJrfRuVslyuR/JV6mVkh5UHypOo/ukWBi8LeDfQjxUMbFIRDbCqHY4Fa/ M0oLlfgXjKeFKnPUJAdHFLWTKGq8jRbQ4RBcgbjNZniVqZOq5iYW35d5ACzHD2tcRQzd iEk5Mczm6fbXreFx7Peleg266eo5FwNo4qDrtNMBxfpsMKq7nfNn45IANwAY4QExFM6Q 9OGfbazcQ8kcO2knhR75HH4eVfLf5ski0LprUpdhFx4dkfrjRd9YMqh7s4IZlCdhmVcy 1/GDfsfuJlV6w0vb479gsK/lJ1HV5MtpdTdP8Htv0qm9QKjfqqXE+WKF4d2xfQ6h4mAA i6xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qavUlmxKqwwH50whFgJkIc5I+rxBkwSULiHgjSYOAqY=; b=HqIHdr/LaZZYco5n/pVfnqY+mklvQ2sI48tQN53GIxQFMPQJrQ+n7SSbzCzMkLHVWX +6nyaNuHYCaPjTUt8fooRlkba0AQRYcwc0wNxgMXTC1P+PqN81aK/Bkn0g2b044mVPNw SSs10fQ5eKT4I5xEGZmr9LyqbQSlCFEKeypyLk0KZA+72w5dB6oY8On3zqrYopB6XU0+ CjhhkWAJ/Kg7+MtfG1a7hCaJjnZXwvp8ORV/sV9wbGLXhMgXMV1zMH0baCfuvdyjJJJP YnIe2Qb3a2CNP0AbeZstZUi19VZE8pII0JEf6dReYhRQ+etLnc4UgQeuGJaV2ZQqLd0H YuuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5319N627iNMnlpVrQsaM2eE0h3FeF9julWxmcLGi7NPjQDk2ag88 nw8cgs95+51bD8+eP7HIsQP5g2l8NTQ8XQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf7wf+LKiUYFioQYOKJydx9e27T2NqhkjfiXzcZCgcbhAwp7ujPL0JlZf7SPioj+khAWazpw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:300a:: with SMTP id r10mr30649900jak.91.1639377121087; Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:32:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (097-069-216-153.res.spectrum.com. [97.69.216.153]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm7305408ils.13.2021.12.12.22.32.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Dec 2021 22:32:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: Eric Sunshine From: Eric Sunshine To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jeff King , Elijah Newren , Fabian Stelzer , Eric Sunshine Subject: [PATCH 04/15] t/chainlint/one-liner: avoid overly intimate chainlint.sed knowledge Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 01:30:48 -0500 Message-Id: <20211213063059.19424-5-sunshine@sunshineco.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da In-Reply-To: <20211213063059.19424-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com> References: <20211213063059.19424-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org The purpose of chainlint.sed is to detect &&-chain breakage only within subshells (one level deep); it doesn't bother checking for top-level &&-chain breakage since the &&-chain checker built into t/test-lib.sh should detect broken &&-chains outside of subshells by making them magically exit with code 117. Unfortunately, one of the chainlint.sed self-tests has overly intimate knowledge of this particular division of responsibilities and only cares about what chainlint.sed itself will produce, while ignoring the fact that a more all-encompassing linter would complain about a broken &&-chain outside the subshell. This makes it difficult to re-use the test with a more capable chainlint implementation should one ever be developed. Therefore, adjust the test and its "expected" output to avoid being specific to the tunnel-vision of this one implementation. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine --- t/chainlint/one-liner.expect | 2 +- t/chainlint/one-liner.test | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect index 237f227349..c64058f7af 100644 --- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect +++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.expect @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ ?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) && ?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) | -?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz +?!SEMI?!(foo; bar) >baz && (foo "bar; baz") diff --git a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test index 69796d7505..be9858fa29 100644 --- a/t/chainlint/one-liner.test +++ b/t/chainlint/one-liner.test @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # LINT: top-level one-liner subshell missing internal "&&" and broken &&-chain (foo; bar) && (foo; bar) | -(foo; bar) >baz +(foo; bar) >baz && # LINT: ";" in string not misinterpreted as broken &&-chain (foo "bar; baz") -- 2.34.1.397.gfae76fe5da