From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0A8C433EF for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239008AbiCDOXU (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:23:20 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58886 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238443AbiCDOXR (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 09:23:17 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7888BB61 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 06:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id m2so1884801pll.0 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 06:22:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=scEAQ/LMzjCoK5ABiHM+/7i5lKvqRAnsiITOtI0wELA=; b=qfIMlXGPPJ2uEhYbQILbRiPud1DoGuY3QkrktvqzKwyAMpORXiszDMcv/pzzXbv2RM kmbDFF3hYSew+G84kBb72hsH/IKBm1qR4EXKTvCIkGXgn6QbfnCzCzAd+MiUG34jo01U bJYoWjT1tu/hkgxzvCPnnIt8fhwjris9RYS2uwyLdQeTHvIMg42GknbmbyCe7vAsrJeC K5/E2DzaysMVuQ4J1EqAbQ/BTQgTyEJSTIEgVauLveT5VeEn7SMaEUlhaXeSELK+Ja8Z xBwfy1JKiIq0Ee/ZaAaPSwVC9Hv8DUFwKvxKanqJT5+mmY30zVJGHYuEb9RXnVRuxVfH PmMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=scEAQ/LMzjCoK5ABiHM+/7i5lKvqRAnsiITOtI0wELA=; b=2ucZ+4a8n+ejUtWO8/xONg9/UZYh20UzEbXzjf+fzrQbesQ4utLqMUVjzkRv2Cel5W qjeIiNjtlttUUcZIDqZY0XgF8hDNcnyUhDndn18eC526VZ4MCzifkScvf1rx27KjYPPu J5c6wY3e9C3+Sah2QH0Xb05Ra3LSBQlnDOYw1e+oYwqTFmcm4TL3hn1CchLUPYmkngMO klvbogzP7ZNJJbezc3TaCPkSr5IG3xu14ypuuvSOBphjGW6QyK/+gM/SURmchpIR9QfU fU4zDi+N2pWidSN3cdFtgzccQNLSUYf0PMWjRda/y5uonW4eZcgYRq8o3/7vCTBrh2Mh H9Xg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531EagSgLjRnrBEZgiywlH688h+9qTZd9dTf5yA5C4RrFfOD4tor VvAI7TFTruW5EpWn3iqDb/I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ39QDE83BARQx/hMdGPMAqiumiQf3BuldyBljX3QpVquvS9qKUoC6ILbsxpAGFTCd0NrwkA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:be0d:b0:151:6b8b:b3a5 with SMTP id r13-20020a170902be0d00b001516b8bb3a5mr26381824pls.27.1646403746761; Fri, 04 Mar 2022 06:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2409:4061:2bc3:d84b:b18a:7bdb:9160:2b60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a12-20020a056a000c8c00b004e1a76f0a8asm6348388pfv.51.2022.03.04.06.22.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Mar 2022 06:22:26 -0800 (PST) From: Abhradeep Chakraborty To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Abhradeep Chakraborty , =?UTF-8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= , Johannes Schindelin , Eric Sunshine , git Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] parse-options.c: add style checks for usage-strings Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:51:54 +0530 Message-Id: <20220304142154.2350-1-chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano < wrote: > Yup, if we can have static and dynamic checks of the same quality, > static checks are always better alternative. In this case, runtime > check would probably be an expedite solution suitable for a shorter > term to fill the gap, as a static check with the same quality as it > would probably need some time to develop. Got it! > I do not have any particular interest. If it is a tool fit for the > task, it would be good to use it, that's all ;-) Okay, then I would like to research if that is a good fit. Johannes is pretty confident about it though. Thanks :)