Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bitmap-format.txt: fix some formatting issues

[Abhradeep Chakraborty <chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com>]

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> True.  Unless we are going to revamp the text in some major way so
> that we produce "true" HTML, not just the text source enclosed in a
> <pre></pre> pair, I would think we are better off keeping it not
> passed to AsciiDoc and leaving it in text format.  After all, modern
> browsers, which I presume those who want HTML output files would
> read them with, can display plain text files just fine, don't they?

I am not sure whether that's a good idea or not. As I come from web
dev background, I know that people get bored if they need to read
a plain-text long article. SEO optimisation also need some beautiful
designing of articles so that people can spend more time with visual
ease.

Of course, git doesn't need any SEO optimisation as it is very much
popular. But readers want some visual satisfaction while reading
Docs. That's why some people complain about GNU sites (git's site is
beautiful by the way).

Obviously, here I am using `people` to refer non git developers who are
curious about git internals.

Thanks :)