From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] diff: the -w option breaks --exit-code for --raw and other output modes
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 18:23:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230821222359.GA1813553@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230821210804.GA1809621@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:08:05PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 05:00:58PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > Alternatively, we could put it in the caller, like so:
> >
> > diff --git a/diff.c b/diff.c
> > index 78f4e7518f..e7281e75eb 100644
> > --- a/diff.c
> > +++ b/diff.c
> > @@ -6528,6 +6528,7 @@ void diff_flush(struct diff_options *options)
> > if (check_pair_status(p))
> > flush_one_pair(p, options);
> > }
> > + options->found_changes = !!q->nr;
> > separator++;
> > }
> >
> >
> > which matches the diffstat technique (I almost thought we could share
> > the code, but for the diffstat we are counting what ends up in the
> > diffstat struct; it does not clean out the original diff_queue when it
> > sees a noop pair).
> >
> > I don't see a real reason to prefer one over the other.
>
> Actually, on second look these are not quite the same. Yours only
> triggers if check_pair_status() is true. So something like
> --diff-filter should affect both output and exit code. Yours gets that
> right, and mine does not. Sorry for the noise. :)
Sorry, I'm dumb again. That is not where diff-filter is handled (it is
handled by diffcore, duh). check_pair_status() is only checking for
DIFF_STATUS_UNKNOWN. I'm not sure when that would ever be set, but it
seems like we should be matching the "if it is output" logic, which is
what you get by calling flush_one_pair(). So yours is definitely
preferable, even if I don't understand the possible differences. ;)
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 16:46 git bug report Paul Watson
2023-08-04 17:28 ` rsbecker
2023-08-04 17:48 ` [EXTERNAL] " Paul Watson
2023-08-04 18:12 ` rsbecker
2023-08-07 15:46 ` Paul Watson
2023-08-08 13:07 ` Paul Watson
2023-08-08 13:28 ` rsbecker
2023-08-08 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-16 23:45 ` [PATCH] diff: tighten interaction between -w and --exit-code Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 5:10 ` Jeff King
2023-08-17 16:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 19:49 ` Jeff King
2023-08-17 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] fix interactions with "-w" and "--exit-code" Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] diff: --dirstat leakfix Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] diff: move the fallback "--exit-code" code down Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] diff: mode-only change should be noticed by "--patch -w --exit-code" Junio C Hamano
2023-08-18 21:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] diff: teach "--stat -w --exit-code" to notice differences Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:29 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] diff: teach "--name-status" and friends to honor "--exit-code -w" Junio C Hamano
2023-08-17 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] fix interactions with "-w" and "--exit-code" Junio C Hamano
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 " Junio C Hamano
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] diff: move the fallback "--exit-code" code down Junio C Hamano
2023-08-21 20:41 ` Jeff King
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] diff: mode-only change should be noticed by "--patch -w --exit-code" Junio C Hamano
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] diff: teach "--stat -w --exit-code" to notice differences Junio C Hamano
2023-08-21 20:45 ` Jeff King
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] t4040: remove test that succeeded for a wrong reason Junio C Hamano
2023-08-18 23:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] diff: the -w option breaks --exit-code for --raw and other output modes Junio C Hamano
2023-08-21 21:00 ` Jeff King
2023-08-21 21:08 ` Jeff King
2023-08-21 22:23 ` Jeff King [this message]
2023-08-21 22:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-21 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-22 1:30 ` Jeff King
2023-08-21 21:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] fix interactions with "-w" and "--exit-code" Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230821222359.GA1813553@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).