git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Daniel Vicarel <shundra8820@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does "merge --continue" expect no arguments?
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 00:31:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <211227.868rw7exvi.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk0ft5toy.fsf@gitster.g>


On Fri, Dec 24 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21 2021, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> Or we could throw in another
>>>
>>>  * document more clearly that "merge --continue" is a mere synonym
>>>    for, and hint that there is no reason to favor it over, "git
>>>    commit".
>>
>> But it's not:
>>
>>     $ git add foo
>>     $ git commit -v
>>     hint: Waiting for your editor to close the file.[...]
>>     ^C
>>     $ git merge --continue
>>     fatal: There is no merge in progress (MERGE_HEAD missing).
>>
>> FWIW I prefer and use it for that reason, i.e. it's useful for scripting
>> to use these "stateful" commands when we're in some sort of rebase/merge
>> "sequence" since it's an extra layer of sanity checking.
>
> There is no additional safety afforded by that, though.  There is no
> reason why one would even try to say "merge --continue" without
> doing any merge to begin with.
>
> The "merge --continue" not taking any pathspec is a bit of safety,
> but even there, "commit" already has its own safety to reject
> pathspec when it notices that it is concluding a conflicted "merge",
> so "merge --continue" is not necessary for additional safety there,
> either.

The reason would be that you're confused about what state you're in.

I've had that a few times, so I prefer it over "git commit", so I daresy
someone less experienced in using git could and would benefit from it as
well.

Usually because my "__git_ps1" and a subsequent "git status" shows one
state, so I'll want to continue the merge, but forgot that I did so in
another terminal tab already, and the real state of the repository might
have moved on to the index being prepared for a non-merge commit.

For "rebase --continue" we change the reflog entry from "rebase (pick)"
to "rebase (continue)". Any reason we wouldn't do the same for "merge
--continue"?:

diff --git a/builtin/merge.c b/builtin/merge.c
index 5f0476b0b76..51ef8ca36d0 100644
--- a/builtin/merge.c
+++ b/builtin/merge.c
@@ -1358,6 +1358,10 @@ int cmd_merge(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 		if (!file_exists(git_path_merge_head(the_repository)))
 			die(_("There is no merge in progress (MERGE_HEAD missing)."));
 
+		strbuf_addstr(&buf, "merge (continue)");
+		setenv("GIT_REFLOG_ACTION", buf.buf, 0);
+		strbuf_reset(&buf);
+
 		/* Invoke 'git commit' */
 		ret = cmd_commit(nargc, nargv, prefix);
 		goto done;
diff --git a/t/t7600-merge.sh b/t/t7600-merge.sh
index c773e30b3fa..7a180f571b7 100755
--- a/t/t7600-merge.sh
+++ b/t/t7600-merge.sh
@@ -772,6 +772,8 @@ test_expect_success 'completed merge (git merge --continue) with --no-commit and
 	git stash show -p MERGE_AUTOSTASH >actual &&
 	test_cmp expect actual &&
 	git merge --continue 2>err &&
+	git reflog -1 >reflog &&
+	grep -F "merge (continue)" reflog &&
 	test_i18ngrep "Applied autostash." err &&
 	git show HEAD:file >merge-result &&
 	test_cmp result.1-5 merge-result &&

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-26 23:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-21 14:50 Why does "merge --continue" expect no arguments? Daniel Vicarel
2021-12-21 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-21 17:51   ` Daniel Vicarel
2021-12-21 17:54     ` Daniel Vicarel
2021-12-22  6:20     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-21 17:57   ` Philip Oakley
2021-12-24 17:08   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-25  2:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-26 23:31       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2021-12-27 19:29         ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found] ` <CAFOYHZC0r35mfOVUExHsBP5=URKFAt_wDTZ51pTc=XkXyogqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-12-23  6:07   ` Daniel Vicarel
2021-12-23 18:35     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=211227.868rw7exvi.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=shundra8820@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).