From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de,
chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com, jonathantanmy@google.com,
kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] t5326: demonstrate potential bitmap corruption
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:09:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3525f8bd-31af-181d-b7a5-6e8a453bbba7@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e30ab1a19115107fc24a25118f2417319bd1b0d.1660944574.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
On 8/19/2022 5:30 PM, Taylor Blau wrote:
> +test_expect_success 'preferred pack change with existing MIDX bitmap' '
> + rm -fr repo &&
Does a previous test not delete 'repo' when necessary?
Or, do previous tests re-use 'repo' and now we are in a region
where we can safely clear that directory? Should we use a
different name?
> + git init repo &&
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr repo" &&
nit: test_when_finished should be the first line of the test.
> + # Generate a new MIDX which changes the preferred pack to a pack
> + # contained in the existing MIDX, such that not all objects from
> + # p2 that appear in the MIDX had their copy selected from p2.
> + git multi-pack-index write --bitmap \
> + --preferred-pack="pack-$p2.pack" &&
> + test_path_is_file $midx &&
> + test_path_is_file $midx-$(midx_checksum $objdir).bitmap &&
> +
> + test_must_fail git clone --no-local . clone2
This section is demonstrating the bug. Perhaps we should have
comments indicating that this is not desired behavior, but is
being demonstrated so the bug can be fixed by a later change?
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 21:30 [PATCH 0/6] midx: permit changing the preferred pack when reusing the MIDX Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] t5326: demonstrate potential bitmap corruption Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 16:09 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-08-22 17:57 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-08-22 19:41 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] t/lib-bitmap.sh: avoid silencing stderr Taylor Blau
2022-08-20 16:44 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-08-22 17:58 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] midx.c: extract `struct midx_fanout` Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] midx.c: extract `midx_fanout_add_midx_fanout()` Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] midx.c: extract `midx_fanout_add_pack_fanout()` Taylor Blau
2022-08-19 21:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] midx.c: include preferred pack correctly with existing MIDX Taylor Blau
2022-08-20 18:40 ` Abhradeep Chakraborty
2022-08-22 18:08 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 17:03 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-22 18:14 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 17:04 ` [PATCH 0/6] midx: permit changing the preferred pack when reusing the MIDX Derrick Stolee
2022-08-22 19:44 ` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] t5326: demonstrate potential bitmap corruption Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] t/lib-bitmap.sh: avoid silencing stderr Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] midx.c: extract `struct midx_fanout` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] midx.c: extract `midx_fanout_add_midx_fanout()` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] midx.c: extract `midx_fanout_add_pack_fanout()` Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] midx.c: include preferred pack correctly with existing MIDX Taylor Blau
2022-08-22 19:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] midx.c: avoid adding preferred objects twice Taylor Blau
2022-08-23 16:22 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-23 16:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] midx: permit changing the preferred pack when reusing the MIDX Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3525f8bd-31af-181d-b7a5-6e8a453bbba7@github.com \
--to=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=chakrabortyabhradeep79@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).