From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: openbsd version? Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:04:02 -0700 Message-ID: <434AD742.2090109@zytor.com> References: <8664s5gxl9.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <7vvf0542fs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <864q7pdvcn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <7vll113yjs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <86ek6tcdou.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86y851aydl.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 10 23:05:48 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EP4ol-0001BK-Vi for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:04:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751239AbVJJVEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:04:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751242AbVJJVEQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:04:16 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:52366 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239AbVJJVEP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:04:15 -0400 Received: from [10.4.1.13] (yardgnome.orionmulti.com [209.128.68.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9AL45xB007531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 14:04:06 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: "Randal L. Schwartz" In-Reply-To: <86y851aydl.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87, clamav-milter version 0.87 on localhost X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on terminus.zytor.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > Johannes> Maybe he who found the documentation lacking is going to fix > Johannes> it? > > I'd be happy to do that. But as a tech writer, I know that it's > insane to not work at least from an implementor's rough draft, to at > least understand the intent of a mechanism, if not the precise design. > There's no implementor's rough draft here, so I can't help. > Sounds like an offer to send Mr. Schwartz some notes to work from. In my experience, sending notes to a good tech writer is about an order of magnitude less painful than writing polished documentation, so that should be easier. -hpa