From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Robear Selwans <rwagih.rw@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: a new way to initialize strbuf
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:13:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <467c035f-c7cd-01e1-e64c-2c915610de01@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200218041805.10939-2-robear.selwans@outlook.com>
Am 18.02.20 um 05:18 schrieb Robear Selwans:
> A new function `STRBUF_INIT_CONST(const_str)` was added to allow for a
> quick initialization of strbuf.
>
> Details:
> Using `STRBUF_INIT_CONST(str)` creates a new struct of type `strbuf` and
> initializes its `buf`, `len` and `alloc` as `str`, `strlen(str)` and
> `0`, respectively.
>
> Use Case:
> This is meant to be used to initialize strbufs with constant values and
> thus, only allocating memory when needed.
>
> Usage Example:
> ```
> strbuf env_var = STRBUF_INIT_CONST("dev");
> ```
>
> This was added according to the issue opened at [https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/398]
I am not a friend of this change at all. Why do so many functions and
strbuf instances have to pay a price (check for immutable string) for a
feature that they are not using?
As the macro is just intended for convenience, I suggest to implement it
using strbuf_addstr() under the hood. That is much less code churn, and
the price is paid only by the strbufs that actually use the feature.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 4:18 [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 0/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST Cover Robear Selwans
2020-02-18 4:18 ` [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 1/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: a new way to initialize strbuf Robear Selwans
2020-02-18 6:21 ` Jeff King
2020-02-18 14:19 ` Robear Selwans
2020-02-18 20:33 ` Jeff King
2020-02-19 8:13 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2020-02-20 18:49 ` René Scharfe
2020-02-21 5:21 ` Robear Selwans
2020-02-27 6:50 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-02-27 15:55 ` René Scharfe
2020-02-18 4:18 ` [GSoC][RFC][PATCH 2/2] STRBUF_INIT_CONST: Adapting strbuf_* functions Robear Selwans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=467c035f-c7cd-01e1-e64c-2c915610de01@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=rwagih.rw@gmail.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).