git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I: git-fetch: -n option disappeared but git-fetch(1) still describe it
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:50:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D8CEA6.5040301@op5.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803121710460.1656@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> git-fetch builtinification (commit v1.5.3.2-93-gb888d61) 
>>>>> apparently dropped -n option (alias to --no-tags) documented in 
>>>>> Documentation/fetch-options.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> Either builtin-fetch.c or Documentation/fetch-options.txt should 
>>>>> be adjusted to sync the code with its docs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Original bug report: 
>>>>> https://bugzilla.altlinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14870
>>>> I have a (very) vague memory that git-fetch.sh had to iterate over 
>>>> tags one by one, making tag-heavy projects excruciatingly slow to 
>>>> fetch from with the shellscript version. Some pathological case with 
>>>> 2700 tags was presented where a fetch took nearly an hour, iirc. 
>>>> AFAIR, the builtinification (or was it a protocol extension?) 
>>>> reduced that time to something around 10 seconds for the 
>>>> pathological case.
>>> AFAIR this was helped by the fetch--tool helper, even at the time of 
>>> non-builtin fetch.
>>>
>>>> Does anyone else have a sharper memory of what caused the -n option 
>>>> to be dropped?
>>> AFAICT this was done because of the parsopt'ification.  But I forgot 
>>> the details.
>>>
>> I had a look at the code. It seems the new way of specifying -n is to 
>> say --no-tags or -t 0, or --tags=0 (although I'm not well-versed enough 
>> in the parseopt thing to be sure). I have no time now, but I'll take a 
>> stab at adding the -n option back tomorrow if nobody beats me to it.
> 
> Maybe like this (completely untested, that will be your task tomorrow):
> 

Looks like how I thought it should be. Test passed fine, both real and
automated. Proper patch incoming in a minute.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-13  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 10:51 I: git-fetch: -n option disappeared but git-fetch(1) still describe it Dmitry V. Levin
2008-03-12 14:52 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-03-12 16:04   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-12 16:06     ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-03-12 16:11       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-13  6:50         ` Andreas Ericsson [this message]
2008-03-13  7:13           ` [PATCH] git fetch: Take '-n' to mean '--no-tags' Andreas Ericsson
2008-03-13  7:30             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47D8CEA6.5040301@op5.se \
    --to=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).