From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Git-aware HTTP transport Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:15:51 -0700 Message-ID: <48B38377.3050901@zytor.com> References: <20080826012643.GD26523@spearce.org> <48B36BCA.8060103@zytor.com> <20080826034544.GA32334@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: david@lang.hm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 26 06:17:14 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KXpzV-0001uT-Kw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 06:17:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751048AbYHZEQH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:16:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750830AbYHZEQG (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:16:06 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:37786 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750815AbYHZEQF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:16:05 -0400 Received: from [172.27.2.85] (c-98-210-181-100.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.210.181.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by terminus.zytor.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m7Q4FpMM024114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:15:52 -0700 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/8089/Mon Aug 25 17:28:51 2008 on terminus.zytor.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: david@lang.hm wrote: > > on the other hand, it would be a good thing if pack files could be cached. > > in a peer-peer git environment the cache would not be used very much, > but when you have a large number of people tracking a central repository > (or even a pseudo-central one like the kernel) you have a lot of people > upgrading from one point to the next point. > Worth noting that this also applies to the raw git protocol. -hpa