From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Subject: Re: Fix signal handler Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:46:13 +0100 Message-ID: <4B699A45.7000905@web.de> References: <4B684F5F.7020409@web.de> <20100203102915.GA25486@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4B696447.10803@web.de> <201002031412.53195.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 03 16:46:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NchQt-0003Id-3J for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:46:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757329Ab0BCPqR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:46:17 -0500 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:59370 "EHLO fmmailgate01.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756809Ab0BCPqQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:46:16 -0500 Received: from smtp06.web.de (fmsmtp06.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.5.172]) by fmmailgate01.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C225B14604E79; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:46:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [78.54.162.123] (helo=[192.168.1.202]) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.110 #314) id 1NchQl-0007Rk-00; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:46:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0 In-Reply-To: <201002031412.53195.trast@student.ethz.ch> X-Sender: Markus.Elfring@web.de X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19trvEN+0QYHCFQ1P//B0RkSYuf+pbYtOusrYNh rUb+IwvG7wQnikkBpGILxkorxKU9/wDKFbUkIe58TFQRN1bHx3 woMFY00mkVs3WF7QMbow== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > So why don't you post patches (either fixes or testcases exhibiting > the issue) instead of more mails containing the same points? > I try to get a feeling about acceptance for update suggestions before they can be expressed in the target programming language. The "correct" wording in the source code might become more work than you might agree with. Regards, Markus