From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Haggerty Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/51] is_dup_ref(): extract function from sort_ref_array() Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:00:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4EE6DBF4.5010409@alum.mit.edu> References: <1323668338-1764-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <1323668338-1764-9-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <7vvcplxq4r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4EE6D61A.2030300@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Drew Northup , Jakub Narebski , Heiko Voigt , Johan Herland , Julian Phillips To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 13 06:00:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RaKU6-0000Zb-1U for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:00:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764Ab1LMFAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:53 -0500 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:46648 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750711Ab1LMFAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:53 -0500 X-Envelope-From: mhagger@alum.mit.edu Received: from [192.168.69.134] (p54BEDFA7.dip.t-dialin.net [84.190.223.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with ESMTP id pBD50b5M022585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:00:37 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: <4EE6D61A.2030300@alum.mit.edu> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 12/13/2011 05:35 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote: > Is it *really* possible to have multiple extra_refs with the same name, > or is this more of a hypothetical problem that requires more careful > analysis? I see that you already answered this question downthread. I will reply to your analysis there. Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/