From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] ... Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:14:13 +0200 Message-ID: <4FD2E9B5.1010709@web.de> References: <1338978856-26838-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1339167235-2009-1-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <1339167235-2009-2-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> <4FD24AE9.8020101@web.de> <20120608211540.Horde.SRiCRHwdC4BP0k9c5TdWBaA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> <4FD258AD.6070601@web.de> <20120608220751.Horde.HHn7fXwdC4BP0luXQhxWxBA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> <4FD265C7.6050807@web.de> <20120608230327.Horde.IXfFTHwdC4BP0mifi63m9KA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= , Lucien Kong , git@vger.kernel.org, Valentin Duperray , Franck Jonas , Thomas Nguy , Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen , Matthieu Moy To: konglu@minatec.inpg.fr X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 09 08:15:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdEwu-0002bS-U9 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:15:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751091Ab2FIGOU convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:14:20 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:57422 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750734Ab2FIGOT (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:14:19 -0400 Received: from birne.lan ([194.22.188.61]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MV4fx-1STWZM31ZN-00YM5h; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 08:14:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 In-Reply-To: <20120608230327.Horde.IXfFTHwdC4BP0mifi63m9KA@webmail.minatec.grenoble-inp.fr> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:DzkgDfcH7TIaVNn4SxoU/1MrVBLOTV6l/epjVHooLdp kF8ljhR3dBD96b4y6L/xLO47F+dM7VXoO5njTOLSrzNoCsiXPy l7YNVNLK2EI/MFotfqMcDkTGzTd/kqXVgdHBzLGnLkNzhnIpqS jTYvh3YQxccr2mEr4qF9WVJdbjM0HG178ans++ln1ShU/ptXsX O/ZF2mIQ+sEa3qUMDcODA== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 08.06.12 23:03, konglu@minatec.inpg.fr wrote: >=20 > Torsten B=F6gershausen a =E9crit : >=20 >> On 08.06.12 22:07, konglu@minatec.inpg.fr wrote: >>> >>> Torsten B=F6gershausen a =E9crit : >>> >>>> On 08.06.12 21:15, konglu@minatec.inpg.fr wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Torsten B=F6gershausen a =E9crit : >>>> >>>>> Which part does not apply ? If you skip the part that's implement= ing the >>>>> exec option, of course Git will not recognize it. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hej, >>>> 2 questions: >>>> a) Where should it apply ? >>>> I tried to apply it on commit f623ca1cae600e97cb0b38131fdd33e4fb66= 9cf8 >>> >>> I just tried to apply it on that commit and it works for me. What's= the >>> error message ? >>> >>>> b) Does the line from my log >>>> "error: unknown option `exec'" >>>> tell us anything? >>> >>> Yes, that the patch was not applied ^^'. >> ------------------------------------------------ >> That's the outcome, if I try to re-apply it: >> Applying: Fwd: [PATCHv3 2/2] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] ... >> error: patch failed: Documentation/git-rebase.txt:210 >> error: Documentation/git-rebase.txt: patch does not apply >> Patch failed at 0001 Fwd: [PATCHv3 2/2] rebase [-i --exec | -ix] ... >> When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved". >> If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip". >> To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort= ". >=20 > Did you first apply the first part [PATCHv3 1/2] of the patch ? >=20 > Lucien Kong. Hej, I have 2 patches with the headline "[PATCHv3 1/2" in my in box. None of them is dealing in any kind with upgrading a command to underst= and "exec". To be able to test under Mac OS it could be helpful if you just re-send one patch to my email. Then I can try to re-do the patch based on f623ca1cae600e97cb0b38 and test it under Mac OS. Does that makes sense? /Torsten