git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git-fc@googlegroups.com, "Richard Hansen" <rhansen@bbn.com>,
	"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Dusty Phillips" <dusty@linux.ca>,
	"Antoine Pelisse" <apelisse@gmail.com>,
	"John Keeping" <john@keeping.me.uk>,
	"Christophe Simonis" <christophe@kn.gl>,
	"Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
Subject: Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 03:12:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5370825f709ef_a8114c1304e2@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53707b5955034_2b5710592f8aa@nysa.notmuch>

Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Felipe, stop this stupid blaming of everybody but yourself.
> 
> Show me evidence that this decision was my fault. Junio certainly hasn't
> said so. You just have no idea what we are talking about.

Here, let me show you.

Junio, can you answer these questions?

 1) What is missing from git-remote-hg/bzr in order for them to be
    considered to be merged to the core?

 2) If a different maintainer steps up, would you consider reconsider
    merging them to the core?

 3) Is there any chance that in the future you would consider them after
    they are more mature, and/or perhaps with a different maintainer?

Unless Junio changes his mind again, the answers to those questions
should be clear already to the people following the discussion
(i.e. not you).

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-12  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-11 23:34 Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core? Felipe Contreras
     [not found] ` <CA+55aFwf9iAKxbvdPV9Up_T709KwBXJWW4g-F829CRQP4YkivQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-12  7:42   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12  8:12     ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2014-05-12 10:28       ` Stefan Beller
2014-05-12 12:05         ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12  9:42 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 10:35   ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
2014-05-12 10:37   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 12:05     ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 12:29       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 13:12         ` David Kastrup
2014-05-12 17:12           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 13:43         ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 17:13           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 11:00   ` David Kastrup
     [not found]   ` <CAHVLzcmqdkf4fMTok+HsXcDOQ5Oz2QdZti3FuzgBUa2T6AWnfA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-12 12:48     ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 13:45       ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2014-05-12 16:13         ` Stefan Beller
2014-05-12 16:40         ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5370825f709ef_a8114c1304e2@nysa.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe@kn.gl \
    --cc=dusty@linux.ca \
    --cc=git-fc@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=rhansen@bbn.com \
    --cc=tboegi@web.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).