From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] merge-ort: implement detect_regular_renames()
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:54:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59863009-1a11-ba74-fdd3-6271977b6ec9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba30bc8686ef11115b369d351b4447c75a7bb9b5.1607542887.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On 12/9/2020 2:41 PM, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
>
> Based heavily on merge-recursive's get_diffpairs() function.
(You're not kidding, and I should have looked here before making
some comments below.)
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
> merge-ort.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/merge-ort.c b/merge-ort.c
> index 92b765dd3f0..1ff637e57af 100644
> --- a/merge-ort.c
> +++ b/merge-ort.c
> @@ -634,7 +634,33 @@ static void detect_regular_renames(struct merge_options *opt,
> struct tree *side,
> unsigned side_index)
> {
> - die("Not yet implemented.");
> + struct diff_options diff_opts;
> + struct rename_info *renames = opt->priv->renames;
> +
> + repo_diff_setup(opt->repo, &diff_opts);
> + diff_opts.flags.recursive = 1;
> + diff_opts.flags.rename_empty = 0;
> + diff_opts.detect_rename = DIFF_DETECT_RENAME;
> + diff_opts.rename_limit = opt->rename_limit;
I assume that opt->rename_limit has been initialized properly
against merge.renameLimit/diff.renameLimit in another location...
> + if (opt->rename_limit <= 0)
> + diff_opts.rename_limit = 1000;
(I made the following comments before thinking to look at
get_diffpairs() which behaves in an equivalent way with this
"1000" constant limit. I'm not sure if there is a reason why
this limit is different from the _other_ limits I discovered,
but it might still be good to reduce magic literal ints by
grouping this "1000" into a const or macro.)
...and this just assigns the default again. Why is this done
here instead of inside the diff machinery? Also, wouldn't a
diff.renameLimit = 0 imply no renames, not "use default"?
I notice that the docs don't make this explicit:
diff.renameLimit::
The number of files to consider when performing the copy/rename
detection; equivalent to the 'git diff' option `-l`. This setting
has no effect if rename detection is turned off.
but also too_many_rename_candidates() has this strange
default check:
/*
* This basically does a test for the rename matrix not
* growing larger than a "rename_limit" square matrix, ie:
*
* num_create * num_src > rename_limit * rename_limit
*/
if (rename_limit <= 0)
rename_limit = 32767;
this is... a much larger limit than I would think is reasonable.
Of course, diff_rename_limit_default is set to 400 inside diff.c.
Should that be extracted as a constant so we can repeat it here?
> + diff_opts.rename_score = opt->rename_score;
> + diff_opts.show_rename_progress = opt->show_rename_progress;
> + diff_opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT;
> + diff_setup_done(&diff_opts);
> + diff_tree_oid(&merge_base->object.oid, &side->object.oid, "",
> + &diff_opts);
> + diffcore_std(&diff_opts);
> +
> + if (diff_opts.needed_rename_limit > opt->priv->renames->needed_limit)
> + opt->priv->renames->needed_limit = diff_opts.needed_rename_limit;
> +
> + renames->pairs[side_index] = diff_queued_diff;
> +
> + diff_opts.output_format = DIFF_FORMAT_NO_OUTPUT;
> + diff_queued_diff.nr = 0;
> + diff_queued_diff.queue = NULL;
> + diff_flush(&diff_opts);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1379,6 +1405,10 @@ void merge_switch_to_result(struct merge_options *opt,
> printf("%s", sb->buf);
> }
> string_list_clear(&olist, 0);
> +
> + /* Also include needed rename limit adjustment now */
> + diff_warn_rename_limit("merge.renamelimit",
> + opti->renames->needed_limit, 0);
I suppose this new call is appropriate in this patch, since you assign
the value inside detect_regular_renames(), but it might be good to
describe its presence in the commit message.
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 19:41 [PATCH 00/11] merge-ort: add basic rename detection Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] merge-ort: add basic data structures for handling renames Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 2:03 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-11 9:41 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] merge-ort: add initial outline for basic rename detection Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 2:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-11 9:40 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-13 7:47 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-14 14:33 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-14 15:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-12-14 16:11 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-14 16:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-12-14 17:35 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] merge-ort: implement detect_regular_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 2:54 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2020-12-11 17:38 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] merge-ort: implement compare_pairs() and collect_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 3:00 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-11 18:43 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] merge-ort: add basic outline for process_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 3:24 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-11 20:03 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming identically Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 3:32 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming differently Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-11 3:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-11 21:56 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename collisions Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] merge-ort: add implementation of normal rename handling Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-09 19:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] merge-ort: add implementation of type-changed " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] merge-ort: add basic rename detection Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] merge-ort: add basic data structures for handling renames Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] merge-ort: add initial outline for basic rename detection Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] merge-ort: implement detect_regular_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] merge-ort: implement compare_pairs() and collect_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] merge-ort: add basic outline for process_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming identically Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming differently Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename collisions Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 14:09 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-15 16:56 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 14:23 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-15 17:07 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-15 14:27 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] merge-ort: add implementation of normal rename handling Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 14:27 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-14 16:21 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] merge-ort: add implementation of type-changed " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 14:31 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-12-15 17:11 ` Elijah Newren
2020-12-15 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] merge-ort: add basic rename detection Derrick Stolee
2020-12-15 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] merge-ort: add basic data structures for handling renames Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] merge-ort: add initial outline for basic rename detection Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] merge-ort: implement detect_regular_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:27 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] merge-ort: implement compare_pairs() and collect_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] merge-ort: add basic outline for process_renames() Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming identically Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] merge-ort: add implementation of both sides renaming differently Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename/delete conflicts Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] merge-ort: add implementation of rename collisions Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] merge-ort: add implementation of normal rename handling Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-12-15 18:28 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] merge-ort: add implementation of type-changed " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59863009-1a11-ba74-fdd3-6271977b6ec9@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).