From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Matthias Baumgarten <matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull.rebase config vs. --ff-only on command line
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:44:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60f1b7853b8a2_ade9208c1@natae.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BEHZcfZNL+PG1vmqXGf4Qs3eoULb4NDDgbmOB30HzJu_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Elijah Newren wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 7:52 AM Matthias Baumgarten
> <matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com> wrote:
> > this is my first time contacting you guys and girls so I hope this mail
> > achieves the expected standard. I've discovered the following behaviour
> > of git:
> >
> > If pull.rebase is configured to true and git pull --ff-only is executed
> > it seems like the config wins, i.e. issuing "Successfully rebased and
> > updated refs/heads/...", which is not what I would expect. I always
> > believed that command line options would overwrite configured options.
> >
> > Is my assumption that command line options always win wrong or is this a
> > bug?
>
> It's a bug.
No it isn't.
Elijah is elevating to fact his opinion of what --ff-only should be
changed to.
But it has not been changed. Today --ff-only is meant only for the merge
mode of `git pull`, and like other merge-only options (e.g. --ff,
--no-ff, and --squash) it's ignored in the rebase mode.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-16 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-16 14:43 pull.rebase config vs. --ff-only on command line Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 15:03 ` Elijah Newren
2021-07-16 16:44 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2021-07-16 16:54 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 18:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-19 14:26 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-19 17:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-22 18:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-22 22:09 ` Felipe Contreras
2021-07-23 9:36 ` Matthias Baumgarten
2021-07-16 16:39 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60f1b7853b8a2_ade9208c1@natae.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.baumgarten@aixigo.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).