From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Leslie P. Polzer" Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:12:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <62339.88.73.238.241.1225102347.squirrel@mail.stardawn.org> References: <200810270252.23392.jnareb@gmail.com> <200810270850.09696.arne_bab@web.de> <200810271041.54511.jnareb@gmail.com> Reply-To: leslie.polzer@gmx.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Arne Babenhauserheide" , slonik.az@gmail.com, mercurial@selenic.com, git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jakub Narebski" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 27 11:42:46 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuPYT-0002T2-LT for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:42:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751756AbYJ0KlV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:41:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751689AbYJ0KlV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:41:21 -0400 Received: from viridian-project.de ([89.149.208.197]:34621 "EHLO viridian-project.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750881AbYJ0KlV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:41:21 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1729 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:41:20 EDT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34584 helo=mail.stardawn.org) by viridian-project.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KuP5H-0001oC-UR; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:12:28 +0100 Received: from 88.73.238.241 (SquirrelMail authenticated user sky) by mail.stardawn.org with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:12:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <200810271041.54511.jnareb@gmail.com> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I'm not sure if I should have mentioned transactions in databases here. > Oh, well... Note however that there are advanced way of doing > transactions in relational databases which lead to dangling things > to be purged when transaction is interrupted. For the record: transactions are applicable to all kinds of databases, not only relational ones. Leslie