git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] Git bisect extends bisecting range on repeated good/bad data
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 16:22:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7A220DC9-C654-40E9-8F04-7B9B3ED3318D@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5zikkq6n.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

> On Dec 13, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> 
> Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org> writes:
> 
>> Git bisect may /extend/ bisection range on repeated good/bad data.  Is this expected?
> 
> It is not "repeated" that is an issue, but yes this is expected.
> 
> The bisection works by finding a mid point to cut the graph into two
> pieces of roughly the same size, and the graph is defined by the
> set of good commits on the bottom (i.e. "we were told that all these
> good commits were good, so there is no point going back the history
> beyond any of them") and the single "bad" commit you gave the last.
> 
> If you give 'bad' that is in the newer part of the history than the
> one that is already known to be bad, then you rewind that single
> "bad" commit, to force/allow the machinery to recompute the midpoint
> [*1*], and because the area to search would be wider when you do so,
> it is very much expected that you'd be offered to test more commits.
> 
> 
> 
> [Footnote]
> 
> *1* I said force/allow is because allowing the machinery to go back
>    and recompute is a way to recover when you gave a "bad" earlier
>    by mistake.
> 

Hi Junio,

Thank you for the answer.

--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org


      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-16 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-13 16:38 [BUG] Git bisect extends bisecting range on repeated good/bad data Maxim Kuvyrkov
2019-12-13 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2019-12-16 13:22   ` Maxim Kuvyrkov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7A220DC9-C654-40E9-8F04-7B9B3ED3318D@linaro.org \
    --to=maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).