From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/12] Add a base implementation of SHA-256 support
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:54:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b1aac2e-b768-cfec-2dfe-61f63066ae1a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829005857.980820-10-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
On 8/28/2018 8:58 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> SHA-256 is somewhat slower to compute than SHA-1 in software. However,
> since our default SHA-1 implementation is collision-detecting, a
> reasonable cryptographic library implementation of SHA-256 will actually
> be faster than SHA-256.
Nit: do you mean "faster than SHA-1DC"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 0:58 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Base SHA-256 algorithm implementation brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] sha1-file: rename algorithm to "sha1" brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] sha1-file: provide functions to look up hash algorithms brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] hex: introduce functions to print arbitrary hashes brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] t: add basic tests for our SHA-1 implementation brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] t: make the sha1 test-tool helper generic brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] sha1-file: add a constant for hash block size brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] t/helper: add a test helper to compute hash speed brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] commit-graph: convert to using the_hash_algo brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 12:41 ` Derrick Stolee
2018-08-30 2:30 ` brian m. carlson
2018-09-03 19:11 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] Add a base implementation of SHA-256 support brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 9:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-29 23:55 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 12:54 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] sha256: add an SHA-256 implementation using libgcrypt brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 8:53 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-29 23:39 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] hash: add an SHA-256 implementation using OpenSSL brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 0:58 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] commit-graph: specify OID version for SHA-256 brian m. carlson
2018-08-29 9:37 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] Base SHA-256 algorithm implementation Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2018-08-30 2:21 ` brian m. carlson
2018-08-30 2:41 ` brian m. carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b1aac2e-b768-cfec-2dfe-61f63066ae1a@gmail.com \
--to=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).