git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jrnieder@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com,
	Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-rebase.txt: add another hook to the hooks section, and explain more
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 10:33:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c1cf1dd-3f70-0c57-ad4f-44453ed565a6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.749.v2.git.git.1585963816430.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

Hi Elijah

On 04/04/2020 02:30, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> 
> For more discussion about these hooks, their history relative to rebase,
> and logical consistency between different types of operations, see
>    https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BG0bFKUage5cN_2yr2DkmS04W2Z9Pg5WcROqHznV3XBdw@mail.gmail.com/
> and the links to some threads referenced therein.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
> ---
>      git-rebase.txt: add another hook to the hooks section, and explain more
>      
>      Changes since v1:
>      
>       * Updated the wording of the last sentence as per Junio's suggestion.
> 
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-749%2Fnewren%2Frebase-and-hooks-v2
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-749/newren/rebase-and-hooks-v2
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/749
> 
> Range-diff vs v1:
> 
>   1:  29a1ff520ba ! 1:  45a5c1c1ff9 git-rebase.txt: add another hook to the hooks section, and explain more
>       @@ Documentation/git-rebase.txt: Hooks
>        +originally implemented as shell scripts and happened to invoke other
>        +commands like 'git checkout' or 'git commit' that would call the
>        +hooks).  Both backends should have the same behavior, though it is not
>       -+entirely clear which, if any, is correct.  We will likely remove both
>       -+of these hooks in the future.
>       ++entirely clear which, if any, is correct.  We will likely make rebase
>       ++stop calling either of these hooks in the future.
>         
>         Interruptability
>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
>   Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 12 +++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> index f7a6033607f..5e0fcd4e9bd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
> @@ -684,9 +684,15 @@ Hooks
>   ~~~~~
>   
>   The apply backend has not traditionally called the post-commit hook,
> -while the merge backend has.  However, this was by accident of
> -implementation rather than by design.  Both backends should have the
> -same behavior, though it is not clear which one is correct.
> +while the merge backend has.  In contrast, the apply backend has
> +traditionally called the post-checkout hook while the merge backend
> +has not. 

This is not correct - both backends call the post-checkout hook, but the 
merge backend suppresses any output from it - see 
https://public-inbox.org/git/6c413abc-f48d-5a02-ac8b-09a0fa80b98d@gmail.com/

Best Wishes

Phillip

> However, the calling of these hooks in both cases was by
> +accident of implementation rather than by design (both backends were
> +originally implemented as shell scripts and happened to invoke other
> +commands like 'git checkout' or 'git commit' that would call the
> +hooks).  Both backends should have the same behavior, though it is not
> +entirely clear which, if any, is correct.  We will likely make rebase
> +stop calling either of these hooks in the future.
>   
>   Interruptability
>   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> base-commit: 274b9cc25322d9ee79aa8e6d4e86f0ffe5ced925
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-04  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-03  4:35 [PATCH] git-rebase.txt: add another hook to the hooks section, and explain more Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-03 19:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-03 19:52   ` Elijah Newren
2020-04-04  1:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2020-04-04  9:33   ` Phillip Wood [this message]
2020-04-05  0:00   ` [PATCH v3] " Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c1cf1dd-3f70-0c57-ad4f-44453ed565a6@gmail.com \
    --to=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=emilyshaffer@google.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).