From: "Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Fabian Stelzer" <fs@gigacodes.de>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/18] chainlint.pl: don't flag broken &&-chain if `$?` handled explicitly
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:29:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7df396ddea4cdaf9d014bb90a38da010676c1ce8.1661992197.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1322.git.git.1661992197.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
There are cases in which tests capture and check a command's exit code
explicitly without employing test_expect_code(). They do so by
intentionally breaking the &&-chain since it would be impossible to
capture "$?" in the failing case if the `status=$?` assignment was part
of the &&-chain. Since such constructs are manually checking the exit
code, their &&-chain breakage is legitimate and safe, thus should not be
flagged. Therefore, stop flagging &&-chain breakage in such cases.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
---
t/chainlint.pl | 6 ++++++
t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect | 9 +++++++++
t/chainlint/chain-break-status.test | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect
create mode 100644 t/chainlint/chain-break-status.test
diff --git a/t/chainlint.pl b/t/chainlint.pl
index ba3fcb0c8e6..14e1db3519a 100755
--- a/t/chainlint.pl
+++ b/t/chainlint.pl
@@ -497,6 +497,12 @@ sub accumulate {
# did previous command end with "&&", "|", "|| return" or similar?
goto DONE if match_ending($tokens, \@safe_endings);
+ # if this command handles "$?" specially, then okay for previous
+ # command to be missing "&&"
+ for my $token (@$cmd) {
+ goto DONE if $token =~ /\$\?/;
+ }
+
# flag missing "&&" at end of previous command
my $n = find_non_nl($tokens);
splice(@$tokens, $n + 1, 0, '?!AMP?!') unless $n < 0;
diff --git a/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect b/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f4bada94632
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+OUT=$(( ( large_git ; echo $? 1 >& 3 ) | : ) 3 >& 1) &&
+test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" &&
+
+{ test-tool sigchain > actual ; ret=$? ; } &&
+{
+ test_match_signal 15 "$ret" ||
+ test "$ret" = 3
+} &&
+test_cmp expect actual
diff --git a/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.test b/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.test
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a6602a7b99c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.test
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if next command handles "$?" explicitly
+OUT=$( ((large_git; echo $? 1>&3) | :) 3>&1 ) &&
+test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" &&
+
+# LINT: broken &&-chain okay if next command handles "$?" explicitly
+{ test-tool sigchain >actual; ret=$?; } &&
+{
+ test_match_signal 15 "$ret" ||
+ test "$ret" = 3
+} &&
+test_cmp expect actual
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 0:29 [PATCH 00/18] make test "linting" more comprehensive Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 01/18] t: add skeleton chainlint.pl Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 12:27 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-02 18:53 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 02/18] chainlint.pl: add POSIX shell lexical analyzer Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 12:32 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-03 6:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 03/18] chainlint.pl: add POSIX shell parser Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 04/18] chainlint.pl: add parser to validate tests Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 05/18] chainlint.pl: add parser to identify test definitions Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 06/18] chainlint.pl: validate test scripts in parallel Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 12:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-03 7:51 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-06 22:35 ` Eric Wong
2022-09-06 22:52 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-06 23:26 ` Jeff King
2022-11-21 4:02 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 13:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-21 14:07 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 14:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-11-21 14:48 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 18:04 ` Jeff King
2022-11-21 18:47 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 18:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 18:52 ` Jeff King
2022-11-21 19:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-11-21 19:28 ` Jeff King
2022-11-22 0:11 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 07/18] chainlint.pl: don't require `return|exit|continue` to end with `&&` Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 08/18] t/Makefile: apply chainlint.pl to existing self-tests Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 09/18] chainlint.pl: don't require `&` background command to end with `&&` Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget [this message]
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 11/18] chainlint.pl: don't flag broken &&-chain if failure indicated explicitly Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 12/18] chainlint.pl: complain about loops lacking explicit failure handling Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 13/18] chainlint.pl: allow `|| echo` to signal failure upstream of a pipe Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 14/18] t/chainlint: add more chainlint.pl self-tests Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 15/18] test-lib: retire "lint harder" optimization hack Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 16/18] test-lib: replace chainlint.sed with chainlint.pl Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-03 5:07 ` Elijah Newren
2022-09-03 5:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 17/18] t/Makefile: teach `make test` and `make prove` to run chainlint.pl Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 18/18] t: retire unused chainlint.sed Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget
2022-09-02 12:42 ` several messages Johannes Schindelin
2022-09-02 18:16 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-02 18:34 ` Jeff King
2022-09-02 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-11 5:28 ` [PATCH 00/18] make test "linting" more comprehensive Jeff King
2022-09-11 7:01 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-11 18:31 ` Jeff King
2022-09-12 23:17 ` Eric Sunshine
2022-09-13 0:04 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7df396ddea4cdaf9d014bb90a38da010676c1ce8.1661992197.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=fs@gigacodes.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).