From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] t5516 (fetch-push): introduce mk_test_with_name() Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:52:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7v38vpetmp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1363783501-27981-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <1363783501-27981-4-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <20130320182830.GJ3655@google.com> <20130320184157.GO3655@google.com> <20130320185844.GB30165@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List , Eric Sunshine To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 20 20:53:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UIP4N-000473-JB for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:53:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932998Ab3CTTwd (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:33 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:55936 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757969Ab3CTTwc (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA7AF96; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=J+T/mG/8O77mjczrNJjE0fjKWxg=; b=kRHpAn ke3YfCV96yDWpNDxZQk5z0pI19byr6ZVQQeVuXa5gi9GqgRhJisVcdGAQ+qYY9ks GF8YdzAfFDhqixtRjM/E0L5GEze+4PkrNZZBZ8axHCREfm+eFt8/sX/7gXqh2EoU m0NrlcM9mqwRy6OqqQtROhGsJtT5QSB7xEgUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ewhAuPODkLNQ3MCZaYOJrcO93DkGJ8tG J4A3Ma/fiYAn0lL5jV+UbF5tMZWYFNLzzdS5BU2Am2667GTr4yWStlXOgQuIQHnB 5JbVSegcsAU/Eue98qRh/D7r7pL89G0xY8DSaXryPjCSA8reVCOcYAnHFdeHk/wK CYPOVYYCrZk= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDE6AF95; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [24.4.35.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9251EAF92; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:52:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20130320185844.GB30165@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:58:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B3BC7404-9197-11E2-8E0D-EA7A2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > ... even though it is more typing, I would argue that: > > mk_empty testrepo && > git push testrepo ... > > is better, because the test script is more readable as a unit. > > None of this is that huge a deal to me (and yet I seem to have written a > page about it :) ), but I figure while we are bikeshedding about test > style... ;-) But the above is a good point.