From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] When a remote is added but not fetched, tell the user. Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:15:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbq4gouej.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080409101428.GA2637@elte.hu> <1207869946-17013-1-git-send-email-g2p.code@gmail.com> <20080411203501.7095b866@localhost> <20080411190816.GA17277@mithlond> <7v4pa8rs00.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Teemu Likonen" , Gabriel , "Johannes Schindelin" , git@vger.kernel.org To: sverre@rabbelier.nl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 12 01:16:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkSUA-0000V5-6r for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 01:16:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758295AbYDKXPv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758196AbYDKXPv (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:51 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:36927 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758253AbYDKXPu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3CA1FD8; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0E11FD7; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:15:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Sverre Rabbelier's message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:35:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Sverre Rabbelier" writes: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> If the user tells you not to fetch, the command should not bother the user >> with excess messages, unless the user explicitly asks to, either. > > I fully agree here, but is there a way for the user to do so? > Especially the beginning user? Perhaps in the form of a -v(erbose) > switch,... Yeah, I am not sure if that should be called --verbose, but a "training wheel" mode of operation somebody else mentioned the other day that echoes back what the command thinks it was told to do by the user, together with help text that explains what other things the user could have told to the command to enrich its operation, might be an interesting addition.