From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: handle file mode changes Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:01:06 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd4pxqoql.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080308171726.GA16129@localhost> <20080313125229.GA24758@localhost> <20080313192246.GA30361@localhost> <20080313224741.GA5000@localhost> <7vhcf9r4qp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080314121752.GB3315@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Clemens Buchacher X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 14 17:03:31 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaCLy-0007nf-Dx for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:01:54 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753415AbYCNQBO (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:01:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752653AbYCNQBO (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:01:14 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:50481 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751852AbYCNQBO (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:01:14 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A6F1336; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:01:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1A21330; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:01:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080314121752.GB3315@localhost> (Clemens Buchacher's message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Clemens Buchacher writes: >> Reading the rest of the function, I notice that it consistently favor "a" >> over "b", when a conflict cannot be reconciled. > > Indeed. I think "b" should be favored over "a", however. Why?