From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix signal handler Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:06:34 -0800 Message-ID: <7veikib96d.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4B684F5F.7020409@web.de> <20100202205849.GA14385@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4B71A2EE.8070708@web.de> <4B72E81B.3020900@web.de> <20100210173348.GA5091@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4B76A985.9070809@web.de> <20100214064745.GC20630@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vsk94qfuy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B7D6B7A.1090004@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Markus Elfring X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 18 21:06:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiCeB-00050C-Aq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:06:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754409Ab0BRUGq (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:46 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:34035 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752683Ab0BRUGp (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:45 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4E29B57E; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:43 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MEYMRZBEfJkyrdl7h0Hw5UcZeSE=; b=wraG9P 0PM/BX37ptHi0ElE3YfvnJbx6MnKu5FNSXqCAFXTansKBPJIg9jGHwTrOsKEzkuc 3mKLR2dZ7eAawvm8pDYbZuGvAGB6yeovFKmPkHZWmfUjYP4/o+pb36L0NFv8oqOg 4UCI/Er2a5cyLULiR7M9oolghzBLmw9zyYb4I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uDwfKEwKN+xAcr+/kDpFV/sLTR6z1xGf Y1wdkQEo1nWN7sD8O7ANos/llUS8L9RoHtIHNYn/dv1TG6ZJuktIXqJ1Cf8kyKgH 3qppCrJ1wVxyZMbiRcIUHCetWDxU4jjwlD2IFeOtLVv0YzoiXPxgBTa5lP8tF7U0 xzYZMHh0OXw= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A0D9B554; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EFBF9B549; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:06:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4B7D6B7A.1090004@web.de> (Markus Elfring's message of "Thu\, 18 Feb 2010 17\:31\:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 209F9D0E-1CC9-11DF-9B64-D83AEE7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Markus Elfring writes: >> Other than that, your comments all looked very sensible. > > Do you expect any more tweaks and fine-tuning for my update suggestion? Are you asking me if _I_ expect? How would I be able to read your mind to see if you will decide to send a polished update? Of are you asking me if I'd apply your patch if you send a polished update, and asking me to decide it before seeing the patch? Sorry, but I am confused.