From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Cogito: cg-clone doesn't like packed tag objects Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:47:09 -0800 Message-ID: <7vek5p8juq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <43348086.2040006@zytor.com> <20050924011833.GJ10255@pasky.or.cz> <7vvf0r6x97.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050924125001.GB25069@pasky.or.cz> <7virwqwd3z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051109223303.GG30496@pasky.or.cz> <7v3bm59zxu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051109233614.GA4051@reactrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 10 00:47:23 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZzeu-0008Qp-UC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:47:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751612AbVKIXrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:47:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751628AbVKIXrM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:47:12 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net ([68.230.241.32]:33493 "EHLO fed1rmmtao07.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751612AbVKIXrL (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:47:11 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051109234648.DJPI16347.fed1rmmtao07.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 18:46:48 -0500 To: Nick Hengeveld In-Reply-To: <20051109233614.GA4051@reactrix.com> (Nick Hengeveld's message of "Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:36:14 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nick Hengeveld writes: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 03:14:21PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > ...; is it safe to assume that the >> > default template post-update hook shipped with GIT will be >> > good-to-be-autoenabled on public repositories >> >> Please yell loudly when somebody posts a patch or brings up a >> proposal to break that assumption in the future. > > Wouldn't this be a problem on public repositories that are hosted with > DAV? Not unless you arrange the DAV server to honor hooks. ;-). IOW, yeah, there may be problems.