From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix signal handler Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:19:33 -0800 Message-ID: <7vsk94qfuy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4B684F5F.7020409@web.de> <20100202205849.GA14385@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4B71A2EE.8070708@web.de> <4B72E81B.3020900@web.de> <20100210173348.GA5091@coredump.intra.peff.net> <4B76A985.9070809@web.de> <20100214064745.GC20630@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Markus Elfring , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 14 11:19:53 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NgbZw-00067n-PM for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:19:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758374Ab0BNKTs (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:19:48 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:48359 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753855Ab0BNKTr (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:19:47 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A3A99A88; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:19:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=c6gGe9vEFl6W7abAj82WDJ3TEm4=; b=kCNAE4 PdwG0VbAK1PKFpDlSATF+H7lmTLNzfX0Y0QgrM6VUS/Ozf9T5JlQooE1y+XsOUZf 50tyZIkvGBxJFyBSGHJUISuC+iqyn/AEiCSu/kGImldnhFIuaor/enfIJICBI2Uo H0gEzghK8tB0SM8jiMqOkTtKhwsyK0N/KErnY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZLVqyIy0JytT2ryPUn8TQH7XJqh602gJ GDUoif2DtFBo36GX8GOWcOPgHqhvXFo5QvYMp2QKGv9845SdNi8rw7vG/XO4Nq8c 1ZfzHauYvGbDa6oXMgyGifO7JNXvJd37WkeWHYYwIcDW9ev60CM4eJ8WB0xYwNaw K5YmZMSpk2g= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C30A99A87; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:19:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C86899A86; Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:19:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20100214064745.GC20630@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun\, 14 Feb 2010 01\:47\:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 758AF202-1952-11DF-BCB6-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > You would have a better chance if you followed the directions in > SubmittingPatches, including sending it to the maintainer, including > your patch inline, and wrapping your commit message. Please do not encourage a patch sent to the maintainer while it is still under active discussion and refinement, aka "not quite ready yet". Other than that, your comments all looked very sensible. Thanks.