git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Denton Liu" <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Makefile: make "sparse" and "hdr-check" non-.PHONY
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 20:17:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82c3d9fc-32ff-c38a-cb44-873af1fb83d1@ramsayjones.plus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUttpgkU6eCOxMj/@coredump.intra.peff.net>



On 22/09/2021 18:53, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:58:16PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> 
>>> All three seem pretty reasonable to me.
>>
>> Heh, interesting. My initial reaction was completely negative! ;-P
>> (and not just mildly negative either, but 'you must be kidding').
>>
>> However, I then thought 'I must be missing something, I'm being
>> stupid and about to embarrass myself in public!'. So, I have
>> been trying hard to understand what these patches are trying to
>> accomplish and just what it is I'm missing. But, I'm coming up
>> blank ...
> 
> I think the point is just avoiding repeated work. If you just manually
> run "make sparse" once in a while, then caching the result probably
> isn't of much value. But if you plan to run, say:
> 
>   git rebase -x 'make sparse'
> 
> then it would be nice for it to avoid checking the same files over and
> over.

I haven't tried, but

    git rebase -x 'make CC=cgcc'

may be a better idea (for some definition of 'better' ;) ).
(if you have been doing all recent builds with CC=cgcc, then
the first commit wouldn't force a complete re-build!).

Using CC=cgcc has a mixed past, sometimes working, sometimes
not (again for some definition of 'working'), for example:

  $ git checkout master
  ...
  $ make clean
  ...
  $ make CC=cgcc >out1 2>&1
  $ ./git version
  git version 2.33.0.514.g99c99ed825
  $ git describe
  v2.33.0-514-g99c99ed825
  $ grep warn out1
  imap-send.c:1461:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http.c:715:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http.c:1776:25: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http.c:1781:25: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http.c:2190:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http.c:2362:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http-walker.c:382:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http-push.c:194:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http-push.c:205:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  http-push.c:206:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  remote-curl.c:855:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  remote-curl.c:945:17: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  remote-curl.c:947:17: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  remote-curl.c:1014:9: warning: expression using sizeof on a function
  $ grep error out1
  $ 

The warnings are due to some gnarly macro magic in the curl headers
which is normally suppressed by setting -DCURL_DISABLE_TYPECHECK in
the SP_EXTRA_FLAGS variable for each of those files. (see e.g the
Makefile:2250).

>> At the heart of my unease is dependencies (or rather the lack) for
>> the 'synthetic object files' *.hco and *.sp. (Also, the addition
>> of even more 'shrapnel' to the build directories - I wrote a patch
>> to remove the useless *.hcc files just after commit b503a2d515e was
>> included, but didn't get around to submitting it).
> 
> I don't consider them shrapnel if they're holding useful results. :)

Heh, yes I am a bit of a curmudgeon! :D

> But overall, I do agree that if we can't make the dependencies solid
> here, this is not worth doing. Sacrificing correctness of the checks for
> reduced computation is not a good idea.

Yes, I suspect that 'make the dependencies solid' will be a
challenge, with drip, drip, fixes being required. (Maybe I
am just too pessimistic - maybe we can accept good enough
rather than perfect. Also, the sparse solution may be easier
than the hdr-check solution).

ATB,
Ramsay Jones

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21 22:55 [PATCH 0/3] Makefile: make "sparse" and "hdr-check" non-.PHONY Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-21 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] Makefile: make the "sparse" target non-.PHONY Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-22  2:24   ` Jeff King
2021-09-21 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] Makefile: do one append in %.hcc rule Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-21 22:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] Makefile: make the "hdr-check" target non-.PHONY Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-22  2:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] Makefile: make "sparse" and "hdr-check" non-.PHONY Jeff King
2021-09-22 16:58   ` Ramsay Jones
2021-09-22 17:53     ` Jeff King
2021-09-22 19:17       ` Ramsay Jones [this message]
2021-09-22 23:28         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-23  1:07           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-23  1:23             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-23  2:17               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-22 19:24     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-23  0:07 ` [PATCH v2] Makefile: make the "sparse" target non-.PHONY Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-23 16:24   ` Jeff King
2021-09-23 17:06     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-23 17:17       ` Jeff King
2021-09-23 17:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-23 23:28       ` Ramsay Jones
2021-09-24  1:16         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-24 16:38           ` Ramsay Jones
2021-09-24  1:30       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-24 19:37         ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28  1:15   ` [PATCH v3] Makefile: add a non-.PHONY "sparse-incr" target Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28  1:43     ` [PATCH v4] " Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-09-28 17:44       ` Junio C Hamano
2021-09-28 19:45         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82c3d9fc-32ff-c38a-cb44-873af1fb83d1@ramsayjones.plus.com \
    --to=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).