Git Mailing List Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: jnareb@gmail.com (Jakub Narębski)
To: "Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Derrick Stolee" <stolee@gmail.com>,
	"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	"Abhishek Kumar" <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>,
	"Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/11] commit-graph: implement generation data chunk
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:09:35 +0200
Message-ID: <85tuwuj08g.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e746628acdb49af5e8eb788864156f54724d4fa.1597509583.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget's message of "Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:39:40 +0000")

All right, it looks like this patch implements first part of step 2.)
and step 3.) in the following plan of adding support for geeration
number v2:

1. compute generation numbers v2, i.e. corrected commit date
2. store corrected commit date [offsets] in new GDAT chunk,
   unless backward-compatibility concerns require us to not to
3. load [and compute] corrected commit date from commit-graph
   storing it as 'generation' field of `struct commit_graph_data`,
   unless backward-compatibility concerns require us to store
   topological levels (generation number v1) in there instead
4. use generation number v2 in more places, where we had to turn
   off using v1 for performance reasons


"Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> From: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
>
> As discovered by Ævar, we cannot increment graph version to
> distinguish between generation numbers v1 and v2 [1]. Thus, one of
> pre-requistes before implementing generation number was to distinguish
> between graph versions in a backwards compatible manner.

Fortunately, we have fixed this issue, and Git does no longer die when
it encounters commit-graph format version that it does not understand.

>
> We are going to introduce a new chunk called Generation Data chunk (or
> GDAT). GDAT stores generation number v2 (and any subsequent versions),
> whereas CDAT will still store topological level.

Should we say anything about storing 64 bit corrected commit date
(geeration number v2) as 32 bit corrected commit date offset?

>
> Old Git does not understand GDAT chunk and would ignore it, reading
> topological levels from CDAT. New Git can parse GDAT and take advantage
> of newer generation numbers, falling back to topological levels when
> GDAT chunk is missing (as it would happen with a commit graph written
> by old Git).

Note that the fact that we do not have special code for handling
mixed-version layers in split commit-graph is not [that] dangerous, as
we don't read this new data yet.  Splitting it to patch 09/11 (next
patch) makes this patch simpler.

>
> We introduce a test environment variable 'GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT'
> which forces commit-graph file to be written without generation data
> chunk to emulate a commit-graph file written by old Git.

All right.

>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/87a7gdspo4.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
> ---
>  commit-graph.c                | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  commit-graph.h                |  2 ++
>  t/README                      |  3 ++
>  t/helper/test-read-graph.c    |  2 ++
>  t/t4216-log-bloom.sh          |  4 +--
>  t/t5318-commit-graph.sh       | 27 +++++++--------
>  t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh | 12 +++----
>  t/t6600-test-reach.sh         | 62 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  8 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)

It might be a good idea to add documentation of this chunk (and only
about this chunk) to Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt

>
> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
> index fd69534dd5..b7a72b40db 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@ -38,11 +38,12 @@ void git_test_write_commit_graph_or_die(void)
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_OIDFANOUT 0x4f494446 /* "OIDF" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_OIDLOOKUP 0x4f49444c /* "OIDL" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_DATA 0x43444154 /* "CDAT" */
> +#define GRAPH_CHUNKID_GENERATION_DATA 0x47444154 /* "GDAT" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_EXTRAEDGES 0x45444745 /* "EDGE" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_BLOOMINDEXES 0x42494458 /* "BIDX" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_BLOOMDATA 0x42444154 /* "BDAT" */
>  #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_BASE 0x42415345 /* "BASE" */
> -#define MAX_NUM_CHUNKS 7
> +#define MAX_NUM_CHUNKS 8

All right, define new chunk and increase the maximum number of chunks
commit-graph file can have.

>
>  #define GRAPH_DATA_WIDTH (the_hash_algo->rawsz + 16)
>
> @@ -389,6 +390,13 @@ struct commit_graph *parse_commit_graph(void *graph_map, size_t graph_size)
>  				graph->chunk_commit_data = data + chunk_offset;
>  			break;
>
> +		case GRAPH_CHUNKID_GENERATION_DATA:
> +			if (graph->chunk_generation_data)
> +				chunk_repeated = 1;
> +			else
> +				graph->chunk_generation_data = data + chunk_offset;
> +			break;
> +

All right.  The size of GDAT chunk is defined by the number of commits,
so nothink more is needed.

>  		case GRAPH_CHUNKID_EXTRAEDGES:
>  			if (graph->chunk_extra_edges)
>  				chunk_repeated = 1;
> @@ -755,7 +763,11 @@ static void fill_commit_graph_info(struct commit *item, struct commit_graph *g,
>  	date_low = get_be32(commit_data + g->hash_len + 12);
>  	item->date = (timestamp_t)((date_high << 32) | date_low);
>
> -	graph_data->generation = get_be32(commit_data + g->hash_len + 8) >> 2;
> +	if (g->chunk_generation_data)
> +		graph_data->generation = item->date +
> +			(timestamp_t) get_be32(g->chunk_generation_data + sizeof(uint32_t) * lex_index);

WARNING: The above does not properly handle clamped data.

If the offset is maximum value that can be stored in 32 bit field, that
is GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX for more that one commit, we wouldn't
know which commit has greater generation number v2 because of this clamping.
The 'generation' data needs to be set to GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_MAX (which
in turn needs to be smaller than GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY).  This is
not done here!

All the above complication would not be an issue if we stored 64 bit
corrected commit date directly, instead of storing 32 bit corrected
commit date offsets. Storing offsets saves at most 4/(2*H + 16 + 4) = 7%
of commit-graph file size (OIDL + CDAT + GDAT with offsets), when
160-bit/20-byte SHA-1 hash is used.

> +	else
> +		graph_data->generation = get_be32(commit_data + g->hash_len + 8) >> 2;

Should we convert GENERATION_NUMBER_V1_MAX into GENERATION_NUMBER_MAX
here, for easier handling of clamped values of generation numbers later
on in backward-compatibile way, without special-casing for v1 and v2?


Here we load and perhaps compute generation number, using v2 if possible
(from GDAT + commit date), with fallback to v1 (from CDAT).

Almost all right... but should this reading be a part of this patch, or
split off into separate patch?

>
>  	if (g->topo_levels)
>  		*topo_level_slab_at(g->topo_levels, item) = get_be32(commit_data + g->hash_len + 8) >> 2;
> @@ -951,7 +963,8 @@ struct write_commit_graph_context {
>  		 report_progress:1,
>  		 split:1,
>  		 changed_paths:1,
> -		 order_by_pack:1;
> +		 order_by_pack:1,
> +		 write_generation_data:1;

All right, here we store the iformation if we should write the GDAT
chunk, taking into account among other things state of the
GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT enviroment variable.

>
>  	struct topo_level_slab *topo_levels;
>  	const struct split_commit_graph_opts *split_opts;
> @@ -1106,8 +1119,25 @@ static int write_graph_chunk_data(struct hashfile *f,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int write_graph_chunk_generation_data(struct hashfile *f,
> +					      struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	for (i = 0; i < ctx->commits.nr; i++) {

Side note: it is a bit funny that some of write_graph_chunk_*()
functions use `for` loop, and some `while` loop to process commits.

> +		struct commit *c = ctx->commits.list[i];
> +		timestamp_t offset = commit_graph_data_at(c)->generation - c->date;
> +		display_progress(ctx->progress, ++ctx->progress_cnt);
> +
> +		if (offset > GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX)
> +			offset = GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX;

This GENERATION_NUMBER_V2_OFFSET_MAX symbolic constant (or equivalet)
should be defined in this patch and not in previous one, in my opinion.

> +		hashwrite_be32(f, offset);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int write_graph_chunk_extra_edges(struct hashfile *f,
> -					 struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
> +					  struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)

This change in whitespace is, I think, incorrect.

>  {
>  	struct commit **list = ctx->commits.list;
>  	struct commit **last = ctx->commits.list + ctx->commits.nr;
> @@ -1726,6 +1756,15 @@ static int write_commit_graph_file(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
>  	chunks[2].id = GRAPH_CHUNKID_DATA;
>  	chunks[2].size = (hashsz + 16) * ctx->commits.nr;
>  	chunks[2].write_fn = write_graph_chunk_data;
> +
> +	if (git_env_bool(GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT, 0))
> +		ctx->write_generation_data = 0;

All right, here we handle newly introduced GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT
environment variable.

> +	if (ctx->write_generation_data) {
> +		chunks[num_chunks].id = GRAPH_CHUNKID_GENERATION_DATA;
> +		chunks[num_chunks].size = sizeof(uint32_t) * ctx->commits.nr;
> +		chunks[num_chunks].write_fn = write_graph_chunk_generation_data;
> +		num_chunks++;
> +	}

Hmmm... so the GDAT chunk does not have a header, and is not versioned.
Does this mean that to move to generation number v3, or add some
additional reachability labeling we would need to either rename the
chunk or add new one?

>  	if (ctx->num_extra_edges) {
>  		chunks[num_chunks].id = GRAPH_CHUNKID_EXTRAEDGES;
>  		chunks[num_chunks].size = 4 * ctx->num_extra_edges;
> @@ -2130,6 +2169,7 @@ int write_commit_graph(struct object_directory *odb,
>  	ctx->split = flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT ? 1 : 0;
>  	ctx->split_opts = split_opts;
>  	ctx->total_bloom_filter_data_size = 0;
> +	ctx->write_generation_data = 1;

But by default we do write the GDAT chunk.

>
>  	if (flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_BLOOM_FILTERS)
>  		ctx->changed_paths = 1;
> diff --git a/commit-graph.h b/commit-graph.h
> index 1152a9642e..f78c892fc0 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.h
> +++ b/commit-graph.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include "oidset.h"
>
>  #define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH"
> +#define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT"
>  #define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_PARSE "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_DIE_ON_PARSE"
>  #define GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS "GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS"
>

All right.

(Though I wonder about the ordering -- but better not to start "bike
shed" discussion).

> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ struct commit_graph {
>  	const uint32_t *chunk_oid_fanout;
>  	const unsigned char *chunk_oid_lookup;
>  	const unsigned char *chunk_commit_data;
> +	const unsigned char *chunk_generation_data;
>  	const unsigned char *chunk_extra_edges;
>  	const unsigned char *chunk_base_graphs;
>  	const unsigned char *chunk_bloom_indexes;

All right, we need to store position of new GDAT chunk.

> diff --git a/t/README b/t/README
> index 70ec61cf88..6647ef132e 100644
> --- a/t/README
> +++ b/t/README
> @@ -379,6 +379,9 @@ GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=<boolean>, when true, forces the commit-graph to
>  be written after every 'git commit' command, and overrides the
>  'core.commitGraph' setting to true.
>
> +GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT=<boolean>, when true, forces the
> +commit-graph to be written without generation data chunk.
> +

All right.

This description could have been more detailed, but I think it is good
enough.

>  GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_CHANGED_PATHS=<boolean>, when true, forces
>  commit-graph write to compute and write changed path Bloom filters for
>  every 'git commit-graph write', as if the `--changed-paths` option was
> diff --git a/t/helper/test-read-graph.c b/t/helper/test-read-graph.c
> index 6d0c962438..1c2a5366c7 100644
> --- a/t/helper/test-read-graph.c
> +++ b/t/helper/test-read-graph.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ int cmd__read_graph(int argc, const char **argv)
>  		printf(" oid_lookup");
>  	if (graph->chunk_commit_data)
>  		printf(" commit_metadata");
> +	if (graph->chunk_generation_data)
> +		printf(" generation_data");
>  	if (graph->chunk_extra_edges)
>  		printf(" extra_edges");
>  	if (graph->chunk_bloom_indexes)

All right, we examine if GDAT chunk is present.

Many commit-graph tests would probably need to be updated; at least
those that make use if `git test-tool read-graph`.

> diff --git a/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh b/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
> index c21cc160f3..55c94e9ebd 100755
> --- a/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
> +++ b/t/t4216-log-bloom.sh
> @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ test_expect_success 'setup test - repo, commits, commit graph, log outputs' '
>  	git commit-graph write --reachable --changed-paths
>  '
>  graph_read_expect () {
> -	NUM_CHUNKS=5
> +	NUM_CHUNKS=6
>  	cat >expect <<- EOF
>  	header: 43475048 1 1 $NUM_CHUNKS 0
>  	num_commits: $1
> -	chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata bloom_indexes bloom_data
> +	chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata generation_data bloom_indexes bloom_data
>  	EOF
>  	test-tool read-graph >actual &&
>  	test_cmp expect actual

All right.

> diff --git a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
> index 044cf8a3de..b41b2160c6 100755
> --- a/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
> +++ b/t/t5318-commit-graph.sh
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ graph_git_behavior 'no graph' full commits/3 commits/1
>  graph_read_expect() {
>  	OPTIONAL=""
>  	NUM_CHUNKS=3
> -	if test ! -z $2
> +	if test ! -z "$2"
>  	then
>  		OPTIONAL=" $2"
>  		NUM_CHUNKS=$((3 + $(echo "$2" | wc -w)))

All right, a fix for issue that is relevant only after this change, now
that there can be more than one extra chunk.

Side note: how I wish that helper function in tests were documented...

> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ test_expect_success 'exit with correct error on bad input to --stdin-commits' '
>  	# valid commit and tree OID
>  	git rev-parse HEAD HEAD^{tree} >in &&
>  	git commit-graph write --stdin-commits <in &&
> -	graph_read_expect 3
> +	graph_read_expect 3 generation_data

All right, we need to treat generation_data as extra, because it can be
not there (it's existence is conditional).

>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'write graph' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git commit-graph write &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "3"
> +	graph_read_expect "3" generation_data

Side note: I wonder why here we have

  	graph_read_expect "3" generation_data

but one test earlier we have

  	graph_read_expect 3 generation_data

without quotes.

>  '
>
>  test_expect_success POSIXPERM 'write graph has correct permissions' '
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ test_expect_success 'write graph with merges' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git commit-graph write &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "10" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "10" "generation_data extra_edges"

All right.  It is why we needed to fix graph_read_expect().

>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'merge 1 vs 2' full merge/1 merge/2
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ test_expect_success 'write graph with new commit' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git commit-graph write &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "11" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "11" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'full graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ test_expect_success 'write graph with nothing new' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git commit-graph write &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "11" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "11" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'cleared graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ test_expect_success 'build graph from latest pack with closure' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	cat new-idx | git commit-graph write --stdin-packs &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "9" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "9" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'graph from pack, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ test_expect_success 'build graph from commits with closure' '
>  	git rev-parse merge/1 >>commits-in &&
>  	cat commits-in | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "6"
> +	graph_read_expect "6" "generation_data"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'graph from commits, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ test_expect_success 'build graph from commits with append' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git rev-parse merge/3 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits --append &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "10" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "10" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'append graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ test_expect_success 'build graph using --reachable' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
>  	git commit-graph write --reachable &&
>  	test_path_is_file $objdir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "11" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "11" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '
>
>  graph_git_behavior 'append graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' full commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ test_expect_success 'write graph in bare repo' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/bare" &&
>  	git commit-graph write &&
>  	test_path_is_file $baredir/info/commit-graph &&
> -	graph_read_expect "11" "extra_edges"
> +	graph_read_expect "11" "generation_data extra_edges"
>  '

All right, those were the straightforward changes.

>
>  graph_git_behavior 'bare repo with graph, commit 8 vs merge 1' bare commits/8 merge/1
> @@ -420,8 +420,9 @@ test_expect_success 'replace-objects invalidates commit-graph' '
>
>  test_expect_success 'git commit-graph verify' '
>  	cd "$TRASH_DIRECTORY/full" &&
> -	git rev-parse commits/8 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits &&
> -	git commit-graph verify >output
> +	git rev-parse commits/8 | GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT=1 git commit-graph write --stdin-commits &&
> +	git commit-graph verify >output &&
> +	graph_read_expect 9 extra_edges
>  '

What this change is about?  Is it about the fact that we have not added
support for checking correctness of GDAT chunk to `git commit-graph
verify`?  But in previous commit we did modify verify_commit_graph()...

>
>  NUM_COMMITS=9
> diff --git a/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh b/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh
> index ea28d522b8..531016f405 100755
> --- a/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh
> +++ b/t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh
> @@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo' '
>  	infodir=".git/objects/info" &&
>  	graphdir="$infodir/commit-graphs" &&
>  	test_oid_cache <<-EOM
> -	shallow sha1:1760
> -	shallow sha256:2064
> +	shallow sha1:2132
> +	shallow sha256:2436
>
> -	base sha1:1376
> -	base sha256:1496
> +	base sha1:1408
> +	base sha256:1528
>  	EOM
>  '

I guess this change is because with GDAT chunk present the positions of
relevant bits that we want to corrupt change (I guess because we have
extra chunk in chunk lookup section).

Someone else would have to verify if this change is in fact correct, if
it was not done already.

>
> @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@ graph_read_expect() {
>  		NUM_BASE=$2
>  	fi
>  	cat >expect <<- EOF
> -	header: 43475048 1 1 3 $NUM_BASE
> +	header: 43475048 1 1 4 $NUM_BASE
>  	num_commits: $1
> -	chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata
> +	chunks: oid_fanout oid_lookup commit_metadata generation_data

All right, we now have 4 chunks not 3 (old ones + generation_data).

>  	EOF
>  	test-tool read-graph >output &&
>  	test_cmp expect output
> diff --git a/t/t6600-test-reach.sh b/t/t6600-test-reach.sh
> index 475564bee7..d14b129f06 100755
> --- a/t/t6600-test-reach.sh
> +++ b/t/t6600-test-reach.sh
> @@ -55,10 +55,13 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' '
>  	git show-ref -s commit-5-5 | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits &&
>  	mv .git/objects/info/commit-graph commit-graph-half &&
>  	chmod u+w commit-graph-half &&
> +	GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH_NO_GDAT=1 git commit-graph write --reachable &&
> +	mv .git/objects/info/commit-graph commit-graph-no-gdat &&
> +	chmod u+w commit-graph-no-gdat &&
>  	git config core.commitGraph true
>  '

All right, we add setup for testing no GDAT case (as if the commit-graph
file was written by "Old" Git).

>
> -run_three_modes () {
> +run_all_modes () {

All right, we compare more modes, among others the no-GDAT case.

Nice futureproofing!

>  	test_when_finished rm -rf .git/objects/info/commit-graph &&
>  	"$@" <input >actual &&
>  	test_cmp expect actual &&
> @@ -67,11 +70,14 @@ run_three_modes () {
>  	test_cmp expect actual &&
>  	cp commit-graph-half .git/objects/info/commit-graph &&
>  	"$@" <input >actual &&
> +	test_cmp expect actual &&
> +	cp commit-graph-no-gdat .git/objects/info/commit-graph &&
> +	"$@" <input >actual &&
>  	test_cmp expect actual
>  }

OK, now we test yet another variant of commit-graph file: one without
the GDAT chunk (testing for backward compatibility with "Old" Git).

>
> -test_three_modes () {
> -	run_three_modes test-tool reach "$@"
> +test_all_modes () {
> +	run_all_modes test-tool reach "$@"
>  }

All right.

>
>  test_expect_success 'ref_newer:miss' '
> @@ -80,7 +86,7 @@ test_expect_success 'ref_newer:miss' '
>  	B:commit-4-9
>  	EOF
>  	echo "ref_newer(A,B):0" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes ref_newer
> +	test_all_modes ref_newer
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'ref_newer:hit' '
> @@ -89,7 +95,7 @@ test_expect_success 'ref_newer:hit' '
>  	B:commit-2-3
>  	EOF
>  	echo "ref_newer(A,B):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes ref_newer
> +	test_all_modes ref_newer
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'in_merge_bases:hit' '
> @@ -98,7 +104,7 @@ test_expect_success 'in_merge_bases:hit' '
>  	B:commit-8-8
>  	EOF
>  	echo "in_merge_bases(A,B):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes in_merge_bases
> +	test_all_modes in_merge_bases
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'in_merge_bases:miss' '
> @@ -107,7 +113,7 @@ test_expect_success 'in_merge_bases:miss' '
>  	B:commit-5-9
>  	EOF
>  	echo "in_merge_bases(A,B):0" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes in_merge_bases
> +	test_all_modes in_merge_bases
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'is_descendant_of:hit' '
> @@ -118,7 +124,7 @@ test_expect_success 'is_descendant_of:hit' '
>  	X:commit-1-1
>  	EOF
>  	echo "is_descendant_of(A,X):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes is_descendant_of
> +	test_all_modes is_descendant_of
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'is_descendant_of:miss' '
> @@ -129,7 +135,7 @@ test_expect_success 'is_descendant_of:miss' '
>  	X:commit-7-6
>  	EOF
>  	echo "is_descendant_of(A,X):0" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes is_descendant_of
> +	test_all_modes is_descendant_of
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'get_merge_bases_many' '
> @@ -144,7 +150,7 @@ test_expect_success 'get_merge_bases_many' '
>  		git rev-parse commit-5-6 \
>  			      commit-4-7 | sort
>  	} >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes get_merge_bases_many
> +	test_all_modes get_merge_bases_many
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'reduce_heads' '
> @@ -166,7 +172,7 @@ test_expect_success 'reduce_heads' '
>  			      commit-2-8 \
>  			      commit-1-10 | sort
>  	} >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes reduce_heads
> +	test_all_modes reduce_heads
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach:hit' '
> @@ -189,7 +195,7 @@ test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach:hit' '
>  	Y:commit-8-1
>  	EOF
>  	echo "can_all_from_reach(X,Y):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes can_all_from_reach
> +	test_all_modes can_all_from_reach
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach:miss' '
> @@ -211,7 +217,7 @@ test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach:miss' '
>  	Y:commit-8-5
>  	EOF
>  	echo "can_all_from_reach(X,Y):0" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes can_all_from_reach
> +	test_all_modes can_all_from_reach
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach_with_flag: tags case' '
> @@ -234,7 +240,7 @@ test_expect_success 'can_all_from_reach_with_flag: tags case' '
>  	Y:commit-8-1
>  	EOF
>  	echo "can_all_from_reach_with_flag(X,_,_,0,0):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes can_all_from_reach_with_flag
> +	test_all_modes can_all_from_reach_with_flag
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'commit_contains:hit' '
> @@ -250,8 +256,8 @@ test_expect_success 'commit_contains:hit' '
>  	X:commit-9-3
>  	EOF
>  	echo "commit_contains(_,A,X,_):1" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes commit_contains &&
> -	test_three_modes commit_contains --tag
> +	test_all_modes commit_contains &&
> +	test_all_modes commit_contains --tag
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'commit_contains:miss' '
> @@ -267,8 +273,8 @@ test_expect_success 'commit_contains:miss' '
>  	X:commit-9-3
>  	EOF
>  	echo "commit_contains(_,A,X,_):0" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes commit_contains &&
> -	test_three_modes commit_contains --tag
> +	test_all_modes commit_contains &&
> +	test_all_modes commit_contains --tag
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: basic topo-order' '
> @@ -280,7 +286,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: basic topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-2 commit-5-2 commit-4-2 commit-3-2 commit-2-2 commit-1-2 \
>  		commit-6-1 commit-5-1 commit-4-1 commit-3-1 commit-2-1 commit-1-1 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: first-parent topo-order' '
> @@ -292,7 +298,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: first-parent topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-2 \
>  		commit-6-1 commit-5-1 commit-4-1 commit-3-1 commit-2-1 commit-1-1 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --first-parent --topo-order commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --first-parent --topo-order commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: range topo-order' '
> @@ -304,7 +310,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: range topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-2 commit-5-2 commit-4-2 \
>  		commit-6-1 commit-5-1 commit-4-1 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-3..commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-3..commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: range topo-order' '
> @@ -316,7 +322,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: range topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-2 commit-5-2 commit-4-2 \
>  		commit-6-1 commit-5-1 commit-4-1 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-8..commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-8..commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: first-parent range topo-order' '
> @@ -328,7 +334,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: first-parent range topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-2 \
>  		commit-6-1 commit-5-1 commit-4-1 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --first-parent --topo-order commit-3-8..commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --first-parent --topo-order commit-3-8..commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: ancestry-path topo-order' '
> @@ -338,7 +344,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: ancestry-path topo-order' '
>  		commit-6-4 commit-5-4 commit-4-4 commit-3-4 \
>  		commit-6-3 commit-5-3 commit-4-3 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --topo-order --ancestry-path commit-3-3..commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --topo-order --ancestry-path commit-3-3..commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'rev-list: symmetric difference topo-order' '
> @@ -352,7 +358,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list: symmetric difference topo-order' '
>  		commit-3-8 commit-2-8 commit-1-8 \
>  		commit-3-7 commit-2-7 commit-1-7 \
>  	>expect &&
> -	run_three_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-8...commit-6-6
> +	run_all_modes git rev-list --topo-order commit-3-8...commit-6-6
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:all' '
> @@ -372,7 +378,7 @@ test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:all' '
>  			      commit-1-7 \
>  			      commit-5-6 | sort
>  	) >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes get_reachable_subset
> +	test_all_modes get_reachable_subset
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:some' '
> @@ -390,7 +396,7 @@ test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:some' '
>  		git rev-parse commit-3-3 \
>  			      commit-1-7 | sort
>  	) >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes get_reachable_subset
> +	test_all_modes get_reachable_subset
>  '
>
>  test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:none' '
> @@ -404,7 +410,7 @@ test_expect_success 'get_reachable_subset:none' '
>  	Y:commit-2-8
>  	EOF
>  	echo "get_reachable_subset(X,Y)" >expect &&
> -	test_three_modes get_reachable_subset
> +	test_all_modes get_reachable_subset
>  '

All right, s/test_three_modes/test_all_modes/... which admitedly could
have been separate pure refactoring patch, but it is not necessary.

>
>  test_done

Best,
--
Jakub Narębski

  reply index

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-28  9:13 [PATCH 0/6] [GSoC] Implement Corrected Commit Date Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] commit-graph: fix regression when computing bloom filter Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 15:28   ` Taylor Blau
2020-07-30  5:24     ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-04  0:46   ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-04  0:56     ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-04 10:10       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-04  7:55     ` Jakub Narębski
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] revision: parse parent in indegree_walk_step() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 13:00   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-07-28 15:30     ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-05 23:16   ` Jakub Narębski
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 13:14   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-07-28 15:19     ` René Scharfe
2020-07-28 15:58       ` Derrick Stolee
2020-07-28 16:01     ` Taylor Blau
2020-07-30  6:07     ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] commit-graph: consolidate compare_commits_by_gen Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 16:03   ` Taylor Blau
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] commit-graph: implement generation data chunk Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 16:12   ` Taylor Blau
2020-07-30  6:52     ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-07-28  9:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] commit-graph: implement corrected commit date offset Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-07-28 15:55   ` Derrick Stolee
2020-07-28 16:23     ` Taylor Blau
2020-07-30  7:27     ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-07-28 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/6] [GSoC] Implement Corrected Commit Date Taylor Blau
2020-07-30  7:47   ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-07-28 16:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-09  2:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] " Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] commit-graph: fix regression when computing bloom filter Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] revision: parse parent in indegree_walk_step() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] commit-graph: consolidate compare_commits_by_gen Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] commit-graph: implement generation data chunk Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-10 16:28     ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-11 11:03       ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-11 12:27         ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-11 18:58           ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 07/10] commit-graph: implement corrected commit date Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-10 14:23     ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-14  4:59       ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-14 12:24         ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] commit-graph: handle mixed generation commit chains Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-10 16:42     ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-11 11:36       ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-11 12:43         ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-09  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] doc: add corrected commit date info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-10 16:47   ` [PATCH v2 00/10] [GSoC] Implement Corrected Commit Date Derrick Stolee
2020-08-15 16:39   ` [PATCH v3 00/11] " Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 01/11] commit-graph: fix regression when computing bloom filter Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-17 22:30       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 02/11] revision: parse parent in indegree_walk_step() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-18 14:18       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 03/11] commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-19 17:54       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-21  4:11         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-25 11:11           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-01 11:35             ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 04/11] commit-graph: consolidate compare_commits_by_gen Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-17 13:22       ` Derrick Stolee
2020-08-21 11:05       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 05/11] commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-21 13:14       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-25  5:04         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-25 12:18           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-01 12:06             ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-09-03 13:42               ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-05 17:21                 ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-09-13 15:39                   ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-28 21:48                     ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-05  5:25                       ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 06/11] commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levels Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-21 18:43       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-25  6:14         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-25  7:33           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-25  7:56             ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-01 10:26               ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-09-03  9:25                 ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 07/11] commit-graph: implement corrected commit date Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-22  0:05       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-25  6:49         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-25 10:07           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-01 11:01             ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 08/11] commit-graph: implement generation data chunk Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-22 13:09       ` Jakub Narębski [this message]
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 09/11] commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain does Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-22 17:14       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-26  7:15         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-26 10:38           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 10/11] commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-22 19:09       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-09-01 10:08         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-09-03 19:11           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-15 16:39     ` [PATCH v3 11/11] doc: add corrected commit date info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-08-22 22:20       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-27  6:39         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-27 12:43           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-27 13:15           ` Derrick Stolee
2020-09-01 13:01             ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-17  0:13     ` [PATCH v3 00/11] [GSoC] Implement Corrected Commit Date Jakub Narębski
     [not found]       ` <CANQwDwdKp7oKy9BeKdvKhwPUiq0R5MS8TCw-eWGCYCoMGv=G-g@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-17  1:32         ` Fwd: " Taylor Blau
2020-08-17  7:56           ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-18  6:12       ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-08-23 15:27       ` Jakub Narębski
2020-08-24  2:49         ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-10-07 14:09     ` [PATCH v4 00/10] " Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 01/10] commit-graph: fix regression when computing Bloom filters Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-24 23:16         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-25 20:58           ` Taylor Blau
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 02/10] revision: parse parent in indegree_walk_step() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-24 23:41         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 03/10] commit-graph: consolidate fill_commit_graph_info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-25 10:52         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-27  6:33           ` Abhishek Kumar
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 04/10] commit-graph: return 64-bit generation number Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-25 13:48         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 05/10] commit-graph: add a slab to store topological levels Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-25 22:17         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 06/10] commit-graph: implement corrected commit date Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-27 18:53         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 07/10] commit-graph: implement generation data chunk Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-30 12:45         ` Jakub Narębski
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 08/10] commit-graph: use generation v2 only if entire chain does Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 09/10] commit-reach: use corrected commit dates in paint_down_to_common() Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget
2020-10-07 14:09       ` [PATCH v4 10/10] doc: add corrected commit date info Abhishek Kumar via GitGitGadget

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85tuwuj08g.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Mailing List Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/git/0 git/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 git git/ https://lore.kernel.org/git \
		git@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index git

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.git


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git