From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: [VOTE] git versus mercurial (for DragonflyBSD) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:16:05 -0700 Message-ID: <86abcocyyy.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <200810272149.13542.arne_bab@web.de> <20081027210716.GS2273@genesis.frugalware.org> <200810272230.51683.arne_bab@web.de> <4907506C.8090609@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arne Babenhauserheide , Miklos Vajna , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org, mercurial@selenic.com, SLONIK.AZ@gmail.com To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 28 20:37:37 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuuNk-0002vX-ET for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:37:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751930AbYJ1TgX (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:36:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751479AbYJ1TgX (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:36:23 -0400 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:32553 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201AbYJ1TgW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:36:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 1216 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:36:22 EDT Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4A0341DE2B8; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:16:05 -0700 (PDT) x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.15.14.5; tzolkin = 10 Chicchan; haab = 8 Zac In-Reply-To: <4907506C.8090609@op5.se> (Andreas Ericsson's message of "Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:48:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (berkeley-unix) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Ericsson writes: Andreas> And please don't give me that rubbish of "but Python is obviously Andreas> better than C". Which one's true (if any) depends only on how you Andreas> define "better". But any way you define it, Perl is "better" than either of those! :-) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion