From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: What's in git.git (stable) Date: 22 Dec 2006 10:21:37 -0800 Message-ID: <86wt4jrdu6.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <7vodpw46zj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <86k60jsvh8.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86fyb7sv9f.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <861wmrsstc.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 22 19:24:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gxp43-0006Ib-4G for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 19:24:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751920AbWLVSYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:24:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751791AbWLVSYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:24:03 -0500 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:34380 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751784AbWLVSYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 13:24:01 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68798DB47; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blue.stonehenge.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04535-01-17; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7673D8DB46; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:21:37 -0800 (PST) To: Johannes Schindelin x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.13.16.9; tzolkin = 10 Muluc; haab = 2 Kankin In-Reply-To: <861wmrsstc.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz writes: Randal> But that's not upward compatible. The default should be the old behavior, Randal> or we need a better way to notify people that this breaks things. Not to mention that the manpage still says: git pull, git pull origin Fetch the default head from the repository you cloned from and merge it into your current branch. So even if I was *looking* for a change in behavior, it wasn't documented. Nothing changed in that area in recent history. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!