From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Re: openbsd version? Date: 10 Oct 2005 13:52:06 -0700 Message-ID: <86y851aydl.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> References: <8664s5gxl9.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <7vvf0542fs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <864q7pdvcn.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <7vll113yjs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <86ek6tcdou.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 10 22:54:15 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EP4dD-0005m6-FS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 22:52:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751230AbVJJUwR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:52:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751229AbVJJUwR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:52:17 -0400 Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([209.223.236.162]:1577 "EHLO blue.stonehenge.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751232AbVJJUwQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:52:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8E18F835; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blue.stonehenge.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blue.stonehenge.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26636-01-4; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by blue.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 403328F840; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:52:07 -0700 (PDT) To: Johannes Schindelin x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.12.12.11; tzolkin = 1 Chuen; haab = 9 Yax In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: >>>>> "Johannes" == Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Undocumented secret switches. Nice. No wonder >> I couldn't find it. Johannes> Maybe he who found the documentation lacking is going to fix Johannes> it? I'd be happy to do that. But as a tech writer, I know that it's insane to not work at least from an implementor's rough draft, to at least understand the intent of a mechanism, if not the precise design. There's no implementor's rough draft here, so I can't help. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!