From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: What is missing from Git v2.0 Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:01:29 +0200 Message-ID: <8738h3ayom.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <53557071.5040500@gmail.com> <5356c1a61f6d8_463e11ef310a5@nysa.notmuch> <20140422213039.GB21043@thunk.org> <53588713347b7_59ed83d308cf@nysa.notmuch> <53588f448d817_59ed83d3084e@nysa.notmuch> <5358bae8ab550_1f7b143d31037@nysa.notmuch> <877g6fb2h6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: James Denholm , David Lang , Theodore Ts'o , Junio C Hamano , Sebastian Schuberth , Git Mailing List To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 24 11:01:44 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WdFXL-0000QA-Qb for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:01:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753207AbaDXJBh (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:01:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:42890 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752536AbaDXJBc (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:01:32 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41929 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WdFX8-0005wX-OL; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 05:01:31 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 484A7E0996; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:01:29 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <5358ca1a55a69_1f7b143d3101c@nysa.notmuch> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 03:23:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras writes: > David Kastrup wrote: >> Felipe Contreras writes: >> >> > James Denholm wrote: >> >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds >> >> > of Git users. >> >> > >> >> > There is such a category of Git users who are not >> >> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either. >> >> >> >> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the >> >> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for >> >> change, and the other would be negatively impacted. >> > >> > Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively >> > by having default aliases? >> >> The people having to read and understand scripts written in the >> expectation of default aliases. > > Which are imaginary. And I prefer them to stay that way since then one does not need to worry about them. >> > And I have showed they are not problems. >> >> You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in >> every Git you use and distribute. > > There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those > problems. You have absolutely no evidence there there will. As I said: you managed to convince yourself and may milk that for all that it's worth. -- David Kastrup