archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jed Brown <>
To: Jeff King <>
Subject: Re: git branch: multiple --merged and --no-merged options?
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 21:46:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Jeff King <> writes:

> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:38:12PM -0500, Jed Brown wrote:
>>   $ git branch --no-merged master --merged next
> Yeah, sadly that does not work, as we use the same slot for the flag and
> store only one of the two (and we also allow only one "--merged" head,
> even though you could in theory want to know "merged to X, or merged to
> Y").

Hmm, I would have said conjunction (AND) was more natural than
disjunction (OR). If we add support for multiple '--merged' and
'--no-merged', do we expect to eventually have a full query grammar?

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-23  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-15 19:38 Jed Brown
2013-03-22 17:50 ` Jeff King
2013-03-23  2:46   ` Jed Brown [this message]
2013-03-23  8:13     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: git branch: multiple --merged and --no-merged options?' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).