From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Kastrup Subject: Re: Pull is Mostly Evil Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 13:02:49 +0200 Message-ID: <874n15vmau.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5363BB9F.40102@xiplink.com> <5364A143.1060404@bbn.com> <87iopnwa2i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5364b11b4db8d_1996f531068@nysa.notmuch> <87eh0bw5gh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5365c45fd101d_6c25cd72ec2e@nysa.notmuch> <53660d8d74c68_1c89b0930c53@nysa.notmuch> <2bbbfedd-b224-4ef0-a611-fe78d3446db8@email.android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Felipe Contreras , David Lang , Richard Hansen , Junio C Hamano , Marc Branchaud , Git Mailing List To: James Denholm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun May 04 13:03:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WguCL-0008Fn-5Z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 04 May 2014 13:03:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753696AbaEDLDD (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 07:03:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37270 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753678AbaEDLDB (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2014 07:03:01 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36309 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WguCA-00089d-KH; Sun, 04 May 2014 07:02:58 -0400 Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D68EE08CF; Sun, 4 May 2014 13:02:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <2bbbfedd-b224-4ef0-a611-fe78d3446db8@email.android.com> (James Denholm's message of "Sun, 04 May 2014 20:37:19 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: James Denholm writes: > On 4 May 2014 19:51:09 GMT+10:00, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > >>But I'm not going to bother any more with you, you are just spreading >>lies and tainting the discussion. > > Well, maybe we'll see what other folks think. According to whose summary? -- David Kastrup