Re: Promoting Git developers

From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Cc: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>,
	git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	Scott Chacon <schacon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Promoting Git developers
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:20:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8zdguxp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD08xoJ2H8XgfDbPfHddX9YFpFgbrY+PZ5Tphuot7JwGvw@mail.gmail.com> (Christian Couder's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:10:28 +0100")

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker
> <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment.
>>>
>>> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite
>>> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound?  I meant it to sound similar
>> to
>>> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the
>> field
>>> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews".
>
> I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command:
>
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review
>
> Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news?
>
>> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more
>> appropriate pun as a name :)
>
> You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title:
>
> http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/
>
> don't you?

"Git Annotate"?

-- 
David Kastrup