git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Nikolay Kasyanov <corrmage@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: A rebase regression in Git 2.18.0
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:17:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87in3ueiks.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <679370A8-E477-450D-96E5-6B1869D27576@gmail.com>


On Tue, Aug 28 2018, Nikolay Kasyanov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’ve found something that may be a regression in git rebase implementation in 2.18.0.
> First I spotted it on macOS but I can also confirm it happening on Linux.
> Git 2.19.0.rc0.48.gb9dfa238d is affected too.
>
> In order to trigger it, a repo layout similar to the following is required:
>
> files/
> 	file1
> 	file2
> 	file3
> 	file4
> 	file5
> project
>
> Let’s call this state baseline. Then, in a branch, let’s edit project file and move file3 to nested/files subdirectory, here’s the final layout:
>
> files/
> 	file1
> 	file2
> 	file4
> 	file5
> nested/
> 	files/
> 		file3
> project
>
> Let’s get back to master and also edit project file to cause a conflict. After that trying to rebase the branch upon master will cause the following git status output:
>
> rebase in progress; onto baf8d2a
> You are currently rebasing branch 'branch' on 'baf8d2a'.
>   (fix conflicts and then run "git rebase --continue")
>   (use "git rebase --skip" to skip this patch)
>   (use "git rebase --abort" to check out the original branch)
>
> Changes to be committed:
>   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>
> 	renamed:    files/file1 -> nested/files/file1
> 	renamed:    files/file2 -> nested/files/file2
> 	renamed:    files/file3 -> nested/files/file3
> 	renamed:    files/file4 -> nested/files/file4
> 	renamed:    files/file5 -> nested/files/file5
>
> Unmerged paths:
>   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>   (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
>
> 	both modified:   project
>
> All renames except file3 are invalid and shouldn’t be here.
> Here’s how the output looks like produced by an older Git version (git version 2.15.1):
>
> rebase in progress; onto baf8d2a
> You are currently rebasing branch 'branch' on 'baf8d2a'.
>   (fix conflicts and then run "git rebase --continue")
>   (use "git rebase --skip" to skip this patch)
>   (use "git rebase --abort" to check out the original branch)
>
> Changes to be committed:
>   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>
> 	renamed:    files/file3 -> nested/files/file3
>
> Unmerged paths:
>   (use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
>   (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
>
> 	both modified:   project
>
> Here’s a ready-to-use repository: https://github.com/nikolaykasyanov/git-rebase-bug.

Thanks for the test case. This bisects down to 9c0743fe1e
("merge-recursive: apply necessary modifications for directory renames",
2018-04-19) first released as part of 2.18.0.

I have not dug to see if the behavior change is desired or not, that
commit changed the results of a bunch of test cases, maybe it was
intended. Elijah?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-28 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-28 12:27 A rebase regression in Git 2.18.0 Nikolay Kasyanov
2018-08-28 13:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2018-08-28 13:33   ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-28 13:46     ` Nikolay Kasyanov
2018-08-28 15:35     ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-28 16:58       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-29  7:06         ` [PATCH 0/3] Turn off directory rename detection in am -3 Elijah Newren
2018-08-29  7:06           ` [PATCH 1/3] t3401: add another directory rename testcase for rebase and am Elijah Newren
2018-08-29 22:12             ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-29 23:47               ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-30 16:01                 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-30 16:26                   ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-29  7:06           ` [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: add ability to turn off directory rename detection Elijah Newren
2018-08-29 12:54             ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-29 23:00               ` Elijah Newren
2018-08-29  7:06           ` [PATCH 3/3] am: avoid directory rename detection when calling recursive merge machinery Elijah Newren
2018-08-29 12:51             ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-30 16:41         ` A rebase regression in Git 2.18.0 Elijah Newren
2018-08-31 10:11           ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-08-31 19:37             ` Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87in3ueiks.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=corrmage@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).